physiological arousal
March 30, 2019
network topology
March 30, 2019

Abstracts

Remember  that an annotation is not the same as an abstract. Abstracts are  descriptive. Your annotations are to be evaluative and critical. Give me  enough information for me to decide if I’m interested enough to read  the paper, and also how you perceive the paper. Don’t go skimpy on these  annotations, but DO NOT write too much here. Quality is far more  important that quantity. This exercise is for each of you to demonstrate  that you can identify, categorize, and digest multiple research  papers. 

Every  resource you choose must be peer reviewed. That means the paper must  have undergone a formal peer review before being published in a journal  or presented at a conference. You must ensure that your resources have  undergone rigorous reviews. In most cases, you can find out the review  process for a conference or journal by visiting the appropriate web  site. Do not simply assume that a resource is peer reviewed – check it  out. 

Here are a few URLs with additional information: (I strongly suggest that you look at these. Really.)

https://sites.umuc.edu/library/libhow/bibliography_apa.cfm
https://www.bethel.edu/library/research/apa-annobib-sixth.pdf\

http://libguides.enc.edu/writing_basics/annotatedbib/apa    <<<< Check out the “Rules! rules! rules!” section

http://guides.library.cornell.edu/annotatedbibliography
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/03/

No plagiarism, it has to 3 papers and APA format.

Please read the above information.

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

WhatsApp chat