APA STYLE- 2 Pages Synthesis: Questions: a. Identify concepts and ideas from multiple sources that improve or strengthen your solution. b. Identify any new found information and the impact that new information may or may not have on your solution. c. Identify potential missing information and the impact that missing information may or may not have on your solution.
Synthesis is an essential aspect of academic research and writing that involves the integration of concepts and ideas from multiple sources to develop a cohesive and comprehensive understanding of a topic. In this two-page synthesis, we will address three key questions:
a. Identify concepts and ideas from multiple sources that improve or strengthen your solution.
b. Identify any new found information and the impact that new information may or may not have on your solution.
c. Identify potential missing information and the impact that missing information may or may not have on your solution.
To glean concepts and ideas from multiple sources, it is crucial to conduct a thorough literature review. This process entails identifying relevant scholarly articles, books, and other credible sources that contribute to the existing knowledge on the chosen topic.
In the context of our problem or research question (which should be explicitly defined), let’s assume that we are exploring potential solutions to reduce pollution caused by vehicular emissions in urban areas. After conducting a comprehensive literature review, we come across multiple sources that provide insights into various strategies and interventions.
One source suggests the implementation of stricter emission standards for vehicles, backed by regular inspections and enforcement. This concept strengthens our solution by emphasizing the importance of regulatory measures to control and reduce pollution levels. Another source highlights the significance of adopting cleaner fuel options, such as electric or hybrid vehicles, as an effective approach to mitigating vehicular emissions. This idea further enriches our solution by expanding the range of potential strategies.
Furthermore, a third source explores the idea of promoting sustainable transportation alternatives, like encouraging walking, biking, or utilizing public transportation. This concept enhances our solution by emphasizing the need for behavioral changes and infrastructure improvements to promote greener commuting habits.
In addition to identifying concepts and ideas that improve or strengthen our solution, it is equally important to analyze the impact of new information on our proposed solution. As we continue to review the literature, we may come across recent studies or updated data that shed new light on the issue at hand.
For example, let’s assume that a newly published study provides empirical evidence of the long-term health effects of vehicular emissions on urban populations. This information significantly impacts our understanding of the problem and the urgency of finding effective solutions. It compels us to further emphasize the importance of reducing pollution and its associated health risks in our proposed solution.
On the other hand, there may be instances where new information challenges or contradicts our initial solution. For instance, a recent study might suggest that stricter emission standards alone are insufficient to curb pollution, and instead, a combination of different interventions is necessary. In this case, we need to reassess our solution and incorporate the new information to ensure its effectiveness.
Moving on to the identification of potential missing information, this task involves recognizing knowledge gaps or areas where further research is needed to strengthen our solution. During the literature review process, it is possible to encounter research limitations or unanswered questions that limit the completeness of our solution.
For instance, we might find that existing studies mainly focus on the impact of vehicular emissions on air pollution but overlook potential effects on water or soil pollution. This missing information prompts us to consider the broader environmental impacts of vehicular emissions and assess whether our solution adequately addresses these aspects.
In conclusion, this two-page synthesis addressed key questions regarding the integration of concepts and ideas from multiple sources and the impact of new information and potential missing information on our proposed solution. Conducting a comprehensive literature review enables us to identify concepts that strengthen our solution, evaluate the impact of new information, and recognize areas that require further research. This synthesis process ensures the development of a robust and well-informed solution to the problem at hand.