2)¨**********APA norms (All paragraphs must be and cit…

Question 1: Discuss the difference between external and internal evidence as it relates to your PICOT search strategy.

In the context of evidence-based practice, external evidence refers to research findings that are generated from studies conducted outside of the immediate clinical setting. This includes studies published in academic journals, books, and other reliable sources of information. External evidence is derived from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and other forms of rigorous research designs. It provides a broader perspective by incorporating findings from multiple studies and allows for generalizability of the results to a larger population.

Internal evidence, on the other hand, is based on the specific context of the clinical practice. It includes the clinician’s own expertise and experience, the patient’s values and preferences, and the available resources within the healthcare setting. Internal evidence is derived from the individual clinical encounter, including patient assessment, diagnosis, and treatment decision-making. It relies on the clinician’s ability to apply their knowledge and judgment to the unique circumstances of a patient’s care.

When conducting a PICOT search strategy, it is important to consider both external and internal evidence. External evidence helps to inform and guide clinical decision-making by providing a foundation of knowledge based on rigorous research. It allows healthcare professionals to stay up-to-date with the latest advances and recommendations in their field. Internal evidence, on the other hand, helps to tailor the external evidence to meet the specific needs and circumstances of the individual patient.

In the context of the PICOT question “Will offspring of diabetic patients undergoing thiazolidinedione therapy benefit by not becoming diabetic later in life?”, external evidence may include studies that investigate the effectiveness of thiazolidinedione therapy in preventing or delaying the onset of diabetes in offspring of diabetic patients. This could include systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials that evaluate the efficacy of thiazolidinedione therapy in this population.

Internal evidence in this context may include the clinician’s experience with using thiazolidinedione therapy in their practice and their knowledge of the patient’s medical history, family history, and risk factors. It also involves considering the patient’s preferences and values, such as their willingness to undergo thiazolidinedione therapy and their understanding of the potential benefits and risks.

By combining external and internal evidence, healthcare professionals can make informed decisions that are evidence-based and patient-centered. Utilizing both types of evidence ensures that clinical care is based on the best available research while also taking into account the unique characteristics and needs of individual patients.

Question 2: Address the strengths and weaknesses of searching in a databank versus a web-based search engine. You must use two databanks mentioned in the text.

When conducting a literature search for evidence-based practice, there are strengths and weaknesses associated with searching in a databank versus a web-based search engine. Two databanks commonly used in healthcare research are PubMed and CINAHL.

PubMed is a widely used bibliographic database that provides access to a diverse range of biomedical literature. It primarily includes articles from journals indexed in MEDLINE, but also includes citations from other sources. One of the strengths of using PubMed is its extensive coverage of biomedical literature, which includes a wide range of topics related to healthcare. It allows for comprehensive searches and provides access to high-quality, peer-reviewed research articles. Additionally, PubMed provides advanced search features, such as filters to narrow down search results by study design, language, publication date, and other criteria.

However, there are also weaknesses associated with searching in PubMed. Despite its extensive coverage, PubMed may not include articles from certain journals or sources that are not indexed in MEDLINE. It may also have limitations in terms of access to full-text articles, especially for articles published in journals that require a subscription. Additionally, the search interface of PubMed can be complex and may require advanced search skills to effectively navigate and retrieve relevant articles.

CINAHL, on the other hand, is a specialized database that focuses on nursing and allied health literature. It includes a wide range of sources, including peer-reviewed journals, books, dissertations, conference proceedings, and more. One of the strengths of using CINAHL is its specificity to nursing and allied health topics, making it a valuable resource for healthcare professionals in these fields. CINAHL also provides advanced search features, including the ability to search by specific nursing concepts and use of subject headings to improve search accuracy.

Similarly to PubMed, there are also weaknesses associated with searching in CINAHL. While it provides comprehensive coverage in nursing and allied health disciplines, it may not include articles from other healthcare fields. CINAHL also has limitations in terms of access to full-text articles, especially for articles published in journals that require a subscription. Additionally, like PubMed, the search interface of CINAHL can be complex and may require advanced search skills.

In comparison, web-based search engines, such as Google or Bing, have their own set of strengths and weaknesses. One of the strengths of web-based search engines is their broad coverage, which includes a wide range of sources not limited to academic journals. This can provide access to a diverse range of information, including grey literature, online resources, and popular media. Web-based search engines also have user-friendly interfaces that are easy to navigate and do not require advanced search skills.

However, there are also weaknesses associated with searching in web-based search engines. The quality and reliability of the information retrieved from web-based search engines can vary significantly, as there is no guarantee that the sources are peer-reviewed or evidence-based. It can be challenging to assess the credibility and validity of the information, as anyone can publish content on the internet. Web-based search engines also lack advanced search features that are available in specialized databases, such as PubMed or CINAHL, which can limit the precision and accuracy of search results.

In conclusion, both databanks and web-based search engines have their strengths and weaknesses when conducting a literature search for evidence-based practice. Databanks, such as PubMed and CINAHL, provide access to high-quality, peer-reviewed research articles in specific disciplines, but may have limitations in terms of coverage and access to full-text articles. Web-based search engines have broad coverage but may lack the reliability and advanced search features of specialized databases. Depending on the research question and the specific needs of the search, healthcare professionals should consider using a combination of both databanks and web-based search engines to ensure a comprehensive and reliable literature search.