Please see the attached file for detailed instructions. Please follow APA guidelines (7th edition) and incorporate weekly resources into the assignment. This assignment is due by 10:59pm EST 10/29/23

Please see orders 5622 for detailed instructions and/or weekly resources so the writer is able to respond appropriately to the two colleagues for this weekly discussion board post. Respond to each colleague in 3-5 sentences or a minimum of a 1/2 page. Grading rubric included on the order 5622 as well.

Please see the attached detailed instructions for this assignment. Incorporate the weekly resources into the discussion post and make sure that each section outlined in the rubric is addressed. Also, be sure to follow the APA guidelines (7th edition). Assignment is due 10/19/23 by 11:59pm EST

LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Chapter 10, “Mixed Methods Procedures”

Rudestam, K. E., & Newton, R. R. (2015). Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Chapter 5, “The Method Chapter: Describing Your Research Plan”

Chapter 11, “How to Complete Your Dissertation Using Online Data Access and Collection”

Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Research methods knowledge baseLinks to an external site.. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.php
Click on the “Analysis” tab on the left to learn more about different types of data analysis.

Walden University. (2014). Office of Research and Doctoral ServicesLinks to an external site.. Retrieved from
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/researchcenter

Walden University. (2014). Research resources and tutorialsLinks to an external site.. Retrieved from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/researchcenter/orqm/researchresources

Document: PhD Prospectus Form Download PhD Prospectus Form(Word document)
https://academicguides.wald

this media piece is 27 minutes.
Walden University, LLC. (Executive Producer). (2012i). Research design and methods II—Part 2. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 13 minutes.
Walden University, LLC. (Executive Producer). (2012j). Research design and methods II—Part 3. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 11 minutes.
Walden University, LLC. (Executive Producer). (2012k). Research design and methods II—Part 4. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Note: The approximate length of this media piece is XX minutes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Once you choose a research method for your dissertation, you should learn everything you can about it. This includes reading several studies that employ this method to understand how it is used. The next step is to determine how you will collect the data and how you will analyze it. How you analyze your data is often stipulated by the research method you chose. If you chose a quantitative method, you will use statistics (e.g., MANOVA, logistical regression, etc.) to analyze your data. The statistics you use will depend on the type of data (nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio) and number of variables in your study. If you chose a qualitative method, your analysis may consist of organizing descriptive information into a story, creating concepts, or identifying themes.

To prepare for this Discussion, watch the media included in this week’s Learning Resources.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES
BY DAY 4
Post a brief description of the research method and data collection method you plan to use for your dissertation. Then describe the specific type of analysis you may use (ANOVA, MANOVA, SEM, concept analysis, etc.) to analyze your data and explain why. Be specific.Include the relevant information from your discussion in the Nature of the Study and/or Research Design Alignment Table in the Prospectus Form.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.
BY DAY 7
Respond to your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:

Suggest an alternative research method and data collection method.
Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
Validate an idea with your own experience.
Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made.

COUN_8550_PUBH_8550_HLTH_8550_Week8_Discussion2_Rubric
COUN_8550_PUBH_8550_HLTH_8550_Week8_Discussion2_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Discussion Posting Content
60 to >53.0 pts
Excellent
Discussion posting demonstrates anexcellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
53 to >47.0 pts
Good
Discussion posting demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting provides moderate detail (including at least one pertinent example), evidence from the readings and other scholarly sources, and discerning ideas.
47 to >41.0 pts
Fair
Discussion posting demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting may be lacking or incorrect in some area, or in detail and specificity, and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
41 to >0 pts
Poor
Discussion posting demonstrates poor or no understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Posting is incorrect and/or shallow and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Peer Feedback and Interaction
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
Student interacts frequently with peers. The feedback postings and responses to questions are excellent and fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
Student interacts moderately with peers. The feedback postings and responses to questions are good but may not fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, additional resources, and stimulating thoughts and/or probes.
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
Student interacts minimally with peers or the feedback postings, and responses to questions only partially contribute to the quality of interaction by offering insufficient constructive critique or suggestions, shallow questions, or providing poor quality additional resources.
13 to >0 pts
Poor
Student does not interact with peers (zero points) or the feedback postings and responses to questions do not contribute to the quality of interaction by offering any constructive critique, suggestions, questions, or additional resources.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent
Postings are well organized, use scholarly tone, contain original writing and proper paraphrasing, follow APA style, contain very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and are fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.
17 to >15.0 pts
Good
Postings aremostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Postings may have some small organization, scholarly tone, writing, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors.
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair
Postings are somewhat below graduate-level writing style. Postings may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or show moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing.
13 to >0 pts
Poor
Postings are well below> graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or show heavy reliance on quoting.
20 pts
Total Points: 100

Please see the attached file for detailed instructions for this week’s discussion board post. Please be sure to adhere to the 7th edition APA formatting guidelines, address each section outlined in the grading rubric, and incorporate the weekly resources as well as other scholarly articles. Assignment is due 10/15/23 by 10:59pm EST. Please look back at the prospectus draft provided early on in the semester as needed for this assignment.

Please see the attached file for detailed instructions for this week’s discussion board post. Please be sure to adhere to the 7th edition APA formatting guidelines, address each section outlined in the grading rubric, and incorporate the weekly resources as well as other scholarly articles. Assignment is due 10/12/23 by 10:59pm EST. Please look back at the prospectus draft provided early on in the semester as needed for this assignment.