2)¨**********APA norms ( All paragraphs need to be cited properly. All responses must be in a narrative format and each paragraph must have at least 4 sentences) 4) **********References from the last 7 years ________________________________________________ The purpose of this Assignment is to help you learn to conduct a review of the literature, correctly identify the level of evidence of primary sources on the evidence hierarchy, and to critique the important aspects of a scholarly research report.
The purpose of this assignment is to develop your skills in conducting a literature review, accurately determining the level of evidence of primary sources on the evidence hierarchy, and critically analyzing important aspects of a scholarly research report. These skills are crucial for researchers and academics as they provide a foundation for producing quality research and contributing to the academic discourse.
In order to conduct a literature review, it is important to understand the process and purpose of doing so. A literature review involves searching and reviewing existing literature on a particular topic to gain a comprehensive understanding of current knowledge and identify any gaps or areas for further research. It helps to establish the context and significance of your own research question, and provides a theoretical framework for your study.
When conducting a literature review, it is essential to use scholarly sources, such as peer-reviewed journals, academic books, and reputable online databases. These sources have undergone a rigorous evaluation process by experts in the field, ensuring their reliability and validity. It is also important to consider the recency of the sources, as the field of research is constantly evolving and new findings may have emerged since older studies were conducted.
Determining the level of evidence of primary sources is a key step in evaluating the strength and validity of the research. The evidence hierarchy provides a framework for categorizing studies based on the quality and scientific rigor of their design. At the top of the hierarchy are systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which provide the highest level of evidence as they synthesize and analyze multiple studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered to be the gold standard for experimental research, followed by cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies. Expert opinions and anecdotal evidence are considered to be at the bottom of the hierarchy, as they lack the rigorous methodology and evidence-based approach of higher-level studies.
Critiquing a scholarly research report involves analyzing various aspects of the study to evaluate its quality, significance, and applicability to the research question or problem. Some important aspects to consider when critiquing a research report include the clarity and adequacy of the research question, the methodology and research design used, the sample size and representativeness, the validity and reliability of measures and instruments, the appropriateness of statistical analyses, and the conclusions and implications drawn from the findings.
Additionally, it is important to evaluate the strengths and limitations of the study, such as any potential biases or confounding factors that may have influenced the results. Critiquing a research report requires a critical and analytical mindset, as well as knowledge of research methods and statistical analysis.
In conclusion, this assignment aims to develop your skills in conducting a literature review, determining the level of evidence of primary sources, and critiquing scholarly research reports. These skills are essential for researchers and academics to produce high-quality research and contribute to the field. Understanding the process and purpose of a literature review, familiarizing yourself with the evidence hierarchy, and becoming proficient in critiquing research reports are fundamental steps toward becoming a well-rounded researcher.