As a practice scholar, you are aware of the vast amounts of new knowledge available to inform practice. Reflect upon this issue and consider the following. Use an . Provide The scholarly source needs to be: 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) Sources should be no more than five years old ( citations and references are included when information is summarized/synthesized and/or direct quotes are used, in which standards apply.
Reflecting upon the vast amounts of new knowledge available to inform practice, it is crucial to rely on evidence-based and scholarly sources to guide decision-making and ensure the highest quality of care. This practice is essential for maintaining professional competence and staying abreast with the latest developments in one’s field. As a practice scholar, it is not only important to access current and relevant information but also to critically evaluate the sources being utilized.
When considering scholarly sources, it is imperative to ensure that they meet certain criteria. First and foremost, the source should be evidence-based, meaning that it is grounded in empirical research and supported by rigorous scientific methods. This means that the information in the source has been derived from well-designed studies, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses, providing a solid foundation for the conclusions and recommendations presented.
Additionally, scholarly sources should display a high level of scholarship in terms of their content and presentation. This could entail being published in peer-reviewed journals, written by experts in the field, or affiliated with reputable academic institutions or research organizations. These indicators contribute to establishing the credibility and reliability of the source, as they signify that the information has undergone a rigorous review process and has been subject to scrutiny by other experts in the field.
The recency of sources is also crucial when considering their applicability to practice. In rapidly evolving fields, such as healthcare or technology, utilizing sources that are no more than five years old ensures that the information is current and reflects the latest developments and advancements. However, it is worth mentioning that in certain disciplines, foundational works or seminal studies may still be relevant even if they were published more than five years ago. In such cases, it is important to provide a rationale for including older sources and to demonstrate their continued significance in the context of the current literature.
A thoughtful approach to using scholarly sources involves a combination of summarization, synthesis, and utilization of direct quotes. When summarizing or synthesizing information from a source, it is important to accurately represent the main ideas and findings while maintaining the original author’s intended meaning. This can be achieved by condensing the information into your own words and providing appropriate citations and references to acknowledge the source. Properly synthesizing information involves integrating ideas from multiple sources and drawing connections between them to develop a coherent and comprehensive argument or discussion.
Furthermore, when using direct quotes, it is crucial to ensure that they are relevant, concise, and used sparingly. Direct quotes are particularly useful when an author’s phrasing or choice of words is essential to convey a specific concept or idea, or when the author’s words hold significant weight or authority in the field. When incorporating direct quotes, it is important to accurately reproduce the original text and provide an appropriate citation to credit the source.
Overall, as a practice scholar, being aware of the vast amounts of new knowledge available to inform practice is essential for staying up-to-date and providing the best possible care. Employing evidence-based and scholarly sources that are no more than five years old ensures that the information utilized is current, credible, and reliable. Properly summarizing, synthesizing, and incorporating direct quotes from these sources contributes to the development of a well-structured and well-supported argument or discussion. By adhering to these standards, practitioners can ensure the highest quality of care and contribute to the advancement of their respective fields.