Critique quality of the literature reviews conducted for two different types of studies- a quantitative and qualitative research. Identify and discuss the research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs (qualitative vs. quantitative), hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings. Discuss the credibility of the sources and the research/researchers findings. 400-word minimum/550-word maximum without the references. Minimum of 3 references in APA format, must have been published within last 3-5 years
Literature reviews are critical components of any research study as they provide a comprehensive overview of relevant scholarly articles, books, and other sources to support the research context. This critique will analyze the quality of literature reviews conducted for two different types of studies: a quantitative research study and a qualitative research study. The analysis will focus on research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs, hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings. Additionally, the credibility of sources and the credibility of the researchers’ findings will be discussed.
For the quantitative study, the literature review identified and categorized relevant sources that addressed the research questions. The research questions were concise and directly related to the study objectives. However, the sampling and sampling sizes were not mentioned in the literature review. To assess the credibility of the study’s findings, it is important to know the details of the sampling process, such as the target population and the criteria for participant inclusion. The lack of this information limits the ability to evaluate the representativeness of the sample and the generalizability of the findings.
Regarding the research design, the literature review acknowledged the use of a quantitative approach, but it did not provide justification for this choice. It would have been beneficial to include an explanation of why a quantitative design was most suitable for addressing the research questions and hypotheses. The hypothesis was clearly stated and directly related to the research questions, which added to the credibility and the internal validity of the study.
The data collection methods were briefly mentioned in the literature review, but there was limited information about the specific instruments or measures used. This omission hampers the assessment of the reliability and validity of the data collection process. Without this information, it is difficult to determine the extent to which the study’s results accurately represent the constructs of interest.
The research findings of the quantitative study were adequately summarized and discussed in the literature review. However, the credibility of the findings would have been strengthened if the researchers had provided statistical analyses and measures of effect size. Reporting these statistical details would have allowed readers to evaluate the significance and magnitude of the study’s findings.
In terms of credibility, the sources cited in the literature review for the quantitative study should be evaluated. It is important to consider the publication dates of the sources to ensure that they are recent and relevant. Additionally, the credibility of the sources themselves, such as the reputation of the journals in which they were published, should be assessed. A lack of credible sources may weaken the credibility of the study’s findings.
Turning to the qualitative study, the literature review demonstrated a deep understanding of the theoretical and conceptual foundations related to the research questions. The research questions were open-ended and exploratory, aligning well with the qualitative research design. However, the sampling and sampling sizes were not explicitly mentioned in the literature review. In qualitative research, the adequacy and appropriateness of the sample size are crucial for generating rich and meaningful data. The absence of this information restricts the evaluation of the representativeness and saturation of the sample.
The research design of the qualitative study was clearly identified as qualitative. The literature review did a commendable job of explaining why a qualitative approach was chosen to address the research questions, emphasizing the need to explore participants’ subjective experiences and perspectives. The absence of a hypothesis is not uncommon in qualitative research, as the focus is typically on generating new understandings rather than testing preconceived notions.
The data collection methods were thoroughly described in the literature review, highlighting the use of interviews and observations. The literature review provided detailed information on the interview and observation protocols, giving readers the ability to assess the rigor and trustworthiness of the data collection process. By including direct quotes and examples from the data, the literature review enhanced the credibility and authenticity of the researchers’ findings.
The research findings of the qualitative study were extensively analyzed and synthesized in the literature review. The researchers used thematic analysis to identify and organize patterns and themes emerging from the data. The use of direct quotes and thick descriptions added richness and depth to the research findings. However, the literature review could have further strengthened the credibility of the findings by including member checking or peer debriefing, which are common strategies in qualitative research to ensure the reliability and validity of the findings.
In terms of source credibility, the literature review for the qualitative study included current and reputable sources that contributed to the theoretical and conceptual framework. However, it is crucial to ensure that a range of perspectives are considered to avoid potential bias or limited generalizability.
In conclusion, the critique of the literature reviews for the quantitative and qualitative studies reveals strengths and weaknesses in various aspects. The quantitative study could have provided more details on the sampling and sampling sizes, data collection methods, and statistical analyses for enhanced credibility. On the other hand, the qualitative study excelled in explaining the research design, data collection methods, and research findings. However, the absence of sampling and sampling size information limits the ability to evaluate the generalizability of the findings. Evaluating the credibility of the sources is crucial for both studies in order to establish the validity of their findings.