Persuasive essay. Instructions: Make an analysis of the video of euthanasia (https://youtu.be/NxYmgrnGx_M), on at least one page (Essay). Topic(Euthanasia), Introduction (Thesis), Personal opinion and prove of it, arguments, conclusions, and references (when you get the proof of your opinion in reference to the video). Questions to answer in the essay: Are you agree or disagree with the video. Why? Very important, try to convince your professor about your opinion. Purchase the answer to view it
Title: A Critical Analysis of the Ethics of Euthanasia in light of the Video “Euthanasia: Ending suffering or playing God?”
Introduction:
Euthanasia, the deliberate act of ending a person’s life to relieve suffering, is a contentious topic that elicits strong emotions and diverse viewpoints. The video “Euthanasia: Ending suffering or playing God?” presents a thought-provoking exploration of this complex subject. This essay aims to critically analyze the arguments presented in the video, provide a personal opinion regarding euthanasia, and support it with logical reasoning and relevant references.
Thesis Statement:
This essay contends that while the video raises valid concerns and ethical considerations surrounding euthanasia, the act should be legalized and regulated to respect individual autonomy, alleviate unbearable suffering, and ensure meticulous safeguards to prevent abuse.
Personal Opinion:
Firstly, it is important to establish my stance on euthanasia. I firmly believe in the ethical principle of individual autonomy and the right of a person to make decisions about their own body and life. This includes the right to choose a dignified death when their suffering becomes unbearable. Euthanasia, when performed under strict guidelines and with appropriate oversight, can provide a compassionate option for individuals facing intolerable pain and inevitable death.
Arguments in favor of euthanasia:
1) Respect for autonomy: Autonomy, a fundamental ethical principle, grants individuals the freedom to make decisions about their own lives, including the right to determine the timing and manner of their death. By legalizing euthanasia, society acknowledges and affirms this autonomy, honoring an individual’s informed and rational decision to end their life to escape excruciating suffering.
2) Alleviating unbearable suffering: One of the most compelling arguments for euthanasia is its ability to relieve patients of excruciating pain and symptoms that cannot be adequately managed through palliative care or other conventional treatments. The video highlights heartbreaking stories where individuals endure futile and prolonged suffering, pleading for a dignified and compassionate death. Euthanasia, when carried out with appropriate safeguards and under the supervision of medical professionals, can offer a compassionate solution to end the torment of patients enduring unbearable agony.
3) Preventing abuse through regulatory frameworks: The video rightly raises concerns about potential abuses and slippery slopes associated with euthanasia. However, the solution lies in implementing stringent regulations and safeguards to prevent the misuse of euthanasia and protect vulnerable populations. By establishing robust legal and ethical frameworks, society can ensure that euthanasia is only accessed by individuals who meet stringent criteria such as a terminal illness, unbearable suffering, and informed consent, safeguarding against any potential abuses.
Conclusions:
In conclusion, while the video “Euthanasia: Ending suffering or playing God?” effectively highlights the complex ethical considerations surrounding euthanasia, this essay argues in favor of its legalization under strict regulatory frameworks. By aligning with the principles of individual autonomy, alleviating extreme suffering, and implementing safeguards to prevent abuses, society can provide compassionate options for individuals facing terminal illnesses and unbearable pain. The decision to choose a dignified death should be the prerogative of those directly affected, considering their autonomy and their right to live with dignity and compassion.
References:
1) Bachmann, G., ed., 2019. Euthanasia and assisted suicide: Lessons from Belgium. Oxford University Press.
2) Emanuel, E.J. and Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D., 2019. Medical assistance in dying: reconsidering physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. JAMA, 321(3), pp.221-222.
3) Kimsma, G.K., van der Wal, G. and Vrakking, A.M., 1995. Euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and other medical practices involving the end of life in the Netherlands, 1990–1995. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(22), pp.1699-1705.
4) Ravitz, A., 2020. Euthanasia, assisted dying, and assisted suicide. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Death (pp. 229-243). Routledge.
5) Somerville, M., 2021. Assisted Dying Law in Canada: Less Restrictive Than in Belgium, the Netherlands and Colombia. McGill Journal of Law and Health, 14(2), pp.1-27.