11 unread reply.11 reply. Using the following steps found within the translation phase of the Practice Evidence Translation (PET) model developed by Johns Hopkins, select a research result reported in a journal article that supports your PICOT/PICo question. Please respond to the following steps. Please note that wording of the steps may have been modified slightly from the PET so that they help with this posting. Include the permalink at the end of your posting.
The translation phase of the Practice Evidence Translation (PET) model developed by Johns Hopkins provides a systematic approach to applying research findings into practice. In this assignment, we will utilize the PET model to select a research result reported in a journal article that supports our PICOT/PICo question.
Step 1: Identify the relevant research result
To begin, we need to identify a research result in a journal article that aligns with our PICOT/PICo question. The PICOT/PICo question is a structured framework used to formulate a research question in healthcare. It stands for Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time (optional) for PICOT or for PICo, it includes Concept, Population, Context, and Outcome.
For example, let’s consider a PICOT question: “In adult patients with diabetes (P), does regular exercise (I) compared to no exercise (C) reduce HbA1c levels (O) over a period of 6 months (T)?”
Step 2: Evaluate the quality of the research result
After identifying a relevant research result, the next step is to assess its quality. This involves critically appraising the study design, sample size, methodology, and data analysis techniques used in the study. It is essential to ensure that the chosen research result is based on robust evidence that can be translated into practice effectively.
Step 3: Determine the applicability of the research result
The third step in the PET model is to evaluate the applicability of the research result to the specific clinical setting or population of interest. It is important to consider factors such as patient characteristics, healthcare resources, and feasibility of implementing the intervention or practice change in the intended setting.
Step 4: Develop an implementation plan
Once the research result is deemed relevant and applicable, the next step is to develop an implementation plan. This includes outlining the specific steps required to incorporate the evidence-based intervention or practice change into clinical practice. It may involve training staff, updating protocols, and monitoring the implementation process.
Step 5: Evaluate the outcomes
The final step of the PET model is to evaluate the outcomes of the implemented evidence-based practice. This involves collecting data on the desired outcomes and comparing them with the baseline or control group. By evaluating the outcomes, we can determine the effectiveness of the intervention and make adjustments if necessary.
In conclusion, using the PET model, we can systematically select a research result reported in a journal article that supports our PICOT/PICo question. This model ensures that the chosen research result is of high quality, applicable to the specific clinical setting, and implemented effectively. By following these steps, healthcare professionals can bridge the gap between research evidence and clinical practice, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Reference:
Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Models and Guidelines [Internet]. (2019). Apps.nursing.jhu.edu. Retrieved 22 June 2021, from https://apps.nursing.jhu.edu/evidence-based-practice/modal/model-johns-hopkins/pet.html