WEEK 3 Review both resources provided below in addition to the assigned readings for this week and reflect on 2 key differences between the UK and US Health systems. What are key opportunities related to advocacy and politics interventions that can be done by advanced practice nurses to improve our current health system Please refer to the resources identified below for details regarding UK Health System. 1. US and UK Health System Comparison- 2. Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker- 3.
The UK and US health systems differ in several key aspects, including their organization and funding mechanisms. These differences present unique opportunities for advanced practice nurses (APNs) to advocate for and intervene in the health systems to improve healthcare delivery. This essay will highlight two key differences between the UK and US health systems and discuss potential advocacy and political interventions that APNs can undertake.
One notable difference between the UK and US health systems is their organization. The UK operates a publicly-funded National Health Service (NHS), which provides comprehensive healthcare services to all residents. The NHS is funded through general taxation, ensuring that access to healthcare is based on need rather than ability to pay. In contrast, the US employs a predominantly private healthcare system, characterized by an insurance-based model. Most Americans receive healthcare coverage through employer-sponsored health insurance or government programs like Medicare and Medicaid. However, a significant proportion of the US population remains uninsured or underinsured, leading to disparities in access to care.
This distinction presents an opportunity for APNs to advocate for greater access to healthcare services in the US. APNs can engage in legislative advocacy to support policies that expand healthcare coverage and decrease out-of-pocket costs for individuals. Additionally, APNs can work within their communities, educating individuals about available healthcare options and connecting them with resources to obtain affordable insurance coverage. By advocating for policies that promote universal healthcare and reducing barriers to access, APNs can contribute to improving the US health system’s overall effectiveness and equity.
Another key difference between the UK and US health systems lies in their funding mechanisms. The UK’s NHS is primarily funded through taxes, ensuring that healthcare services are provided free of charge at the point of care. This centralized funding model allows for comprehensive coverage and reduces financial barriers to accessing care. In contrast, the US health system relies heavily on private insurance, resulting in a complex web of costs, copays, and deductibles. As a result, many Americans face financial burdens and may postpone or forgo necessary healthcare due to the high costs involved.
APNs can leverage their expertise and influence to advocate for healthcare financing reforms in the US. By promoting alternative funding models, such as a single-payer system, APNs can advocate for a more equitable and efficient healthcare system. A single-payer system would streamline billing processes, reduce administrative costs, and ensure that all Americans have access to comprehensive healthcare services without financial barriers. APNs can engage in political advocacy, partnering with professional organizations and policymakers to push for healthcare financing reforms.
In conclusion, the UK and US health systems differ significantly in terms of their organization and funding mechanisms. These differences present opportunities for APNs to advocate for and intervene in the health system to improve healthcare delivery. APNs can engage in legislative advocacy to support policies that expand healthcare coverage and reduce financial burdens for individuals in the US. They can also promote alternative funding models, such as a single-payer system, to ensure equity and efficiency in healthcare financing. By engaging in advocacy and political interventions, APNs can contribute to improving the overall effectiveness and equity of the UK and US health systems.