After discussion with your preceptor, name one financial aspect, one quality aspect, and one clinical aspect that need to be taken into account for developing the evidence-based change proposal. Explain how your proposal will directly and indirectly impact each of the aspects. (change proposal based on the topic after discharge follow up)

Introduction

Developing an evidence-based change proposal requires the consideration of various factors to ensure its successful implementation. In the context of after-discharge follow-up, three important aspects must be taken into account: financial, quality, and clinical. This paper will discuss each of these aspects and how the proposed change will directly and indirectly impact them.

Financial Aspect

One crucial financial aspect to consider when developing an evidence-based change proposal for after-discharge follow-up is the cost-effectiveness of the intervention. While the primary goal of after-discharge follow-up is to improve patient outcomes and enhance the continuity of care, it is essential to evaluate the economic implications as well. Implementing an evidence-based change may involve additional resources such as hiring more healthcare providers, investing in technology, or restructuring the existing workflow. Therefore, understanding the financial impact is crucial to ensure the proposal’s feasibility and sustainability.

The proposed change in after-discharge follow-up can have both direct and indirect financial impacts. Directly, the change may require initial investments in infrastructure and human resources, which can potentially increase healthcare costs in the short term. However, these upfront expenses can lead to long-term cost savings by preventing complications, reducing hospital readmission rates, and avoiding emergency department visits. Improved follow-up care can also enhance patient satisfaction, leading to increased patient loyalty and word-of-mouth referrals, which can have positive financial implications for the healthcare organization. Additionally, by aligning with evidence-based practices, the proposed change may help organizations optimize the resource allocation and utilization, contributing to overall financial efficiency.

Quality Aspect

In the context of after-discharge follow-up, ensuring the provision of high-quality care should be a central objective when developing an evidence-based change proposal. Quality aspects encompass elements such as patient safety, effectiveness of care, timeliness, efficiency, patient-centeredness, and equity. By addressing these dimensions, healthcare organizations can enhance the overall quality of care provided to patients throughout their care continuum.

The proposed change in after-discharge follow-up can directly impact the quality aspect by improving patient safety and reducing adverse events. By promptly following up with patients after discharge, healthcare providers can identify and address any potential issues or complications that may arise, preventing further harm and optimizing patient outcomes. Moreover, the change can increase the effectiveness of care by ensuring that patients receive appropriate follow-up interventions, such as medication adjustments or therapy sessions, as recommended by evidence-based guidelines. Timeliness of care can also be improved by implementing a standardized system for after-discharge follow-up, reducing delays and ensuring timely interventions. Additionally, by incorporating patient-centered approaches, the proposed change can enhance patients’ overall experience and satisfaction with their care, leading to improved patient outcomes and loyalty.

Clinical Aspect

The clinical aspect is a fundamental consideration when developing an evidence-based change proposal for after-discharge follow-up. This aspect focuses on healthcare providers’ clinical knowledge and skills, their adherence to best practices, and the integration of evidence-based guidelines into clinical decision-making. The proposed change aims to optimize clinical outcomes and enhance the delivery of evidence-based care to patients.

The proposed change in after-discharge follow-up can directly impact the clinical aspect by fostering adherence to evidence-based practices. By implementing standardized protocols and guidelines, healthcare providers can ensure consistent delivery of care and promote evidence-based decision-making. This can ultimately lead to improved clinical outcomes, such as reduced readmission rates, better medication adherence, and improved patient self-management. Additionally, the change can indirectly impact the clinical aspect by fostering a culture of continuous learning, where healthcare providers are encouraged to stay updated with the latest research and guidelines in their field. This can enhance their clinical knowledge and skills, ultimately benefiting patient care.

Conclusion

When developing an evidence-based change proposal for after-discharge follow-up, the financial, quality, and clinical aspects must be considered. The proposed change can impact these aspects directly and indirectly, leading to better financial outcomes, improved quality of care, and enhanced clinical outcomes. By addressing these aspects, healthcare organizations can ensure the successful implementation of the change proposal and ultimately provide better care to patients after discharge.