APA format 100% original work 3 paragraphs or 3 sentences each 200 words References and in text citations are needed. You have been asked to be a peer reviewer for a team of nurse researchers who are conducting a phenomenological study of the experiences of physical abuse during pregnancy. What specific questions would you ask the team during debriefing and what documents would you want the researchers to share?
As a peer reviewer for a team of nurse researchers conducting a phenomenological study on the experiences of physical abuse during pregnancy, there are several specific questions I would ask during the debriefing session. These questions would aim to gain a clear understanding of the study methodology, researcher reflexivity, data collection and analysis processes, ethical considerations, and the overall rigor and credibility of the study.
Firstly, I would inquire about the team’s selection of the phenomenological approach for studying the experiences of physical abuse during pregnancy. Specifically, I would ask why they chose phenomenology and how they believe this approach will enhance our understanding of the topic. In addition, I would ask about the team’s familiarity with phenomenological research and what steps they have taken to ensure methodological rigor and validity within this framework.
Next, I would ask about the team’s strategies for ensuring researcher reflexivity throughout the study. It is important to understand how the researchers plan to acknowledge and minimize their own biases and preconceived notions during data collection and analysis. I would ask if they have considered engaging in reflexivity exercises, such as journaling or discussions with other team members, to enhance their self-awareness and minimize potential biases during the study process.
Furthermore, I would inquire about the team’s data collection and analysis processes. I would want to know what methods they plan on using to collect data, such as interviews or focus groups, and how they will ensure confidentiality and privacy for participants. Additionally, I would ask about their plans for data analysis, including how they will identify and code themes and ensure inter-rater reliability if multiple researchers are involved in the analysis process.
In terms of ethical considerations, I would ask the team how they plan to address potential concerns, such as informed consent, participant confidentiality, and potential harm to participants. It is important to understand how the team plans to protect the rights and welfare of the participants and what steps they have taken to obtain ethical approval for the study.
Lastly, I would request the researchers to share several documents for review. Firstly, I would ask for a copy of their research proposal or study protocol, which would provide insights into their research objectives, study design, and methods. Additionally, I would ask for a sample of interview or focus group questions to understand how they plan to gather data. I would also request access to any consent forms or information sheets to assess whether they adequately inform participants about the study and its potential risks and benefits. Lastly, I would want to review any emergent findings or preliminary analysis to gain an understanding of the potential themes that have emerged from the data.
In conclusion, as a peer reviewer, it would be crucial to ask specific questions during the debriefing session to gain a comprehensive understanding of the research team’s methodology, reflexivity, data collection and analysis processes, ethical considerations, and overall rigor and credibility of the study. Additionally, requesting relevant documents such as the research proposal, interview questions, consent forms, and preliminary analysis would facilitate a thorough review of the study.