Based on “Case Study: End of Life Decisions,” the Christian worldview, and the worldview questions presented in the required topic Resources you will complete an ethical analysis of George’s situation and his decision from the perspective of the Christian worldview. Provide a 1,500-2,000-word ethical analysis while answering the following questions: Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.
Abstract
This paper presents an ethical analysis of George’s end-of-life decision from the perspective of the Christian worldview. It explores the case study provided, as well as the relevant worldview questions, to evaluate the ethical implications of George’s decision. This analysis is supported by the resources on the Christian worldview and provides insights into the moral considerations involved in end-of-life decision-making.
Introduction
The case study of George presents a complex scenario where a man must make a decision regarding his end-of-life care. George has been diagnosed with a terminal illness and is considering two options for his treatment: participating in a clinical trial or receiving comfort care. This analysis will examine George’s decision from the Christian worldview, considering the ethical implications involved.
Worldview Question 1: What is a human being, and what happens to a person at death?
To understand the Christian perspective on end-of-life decisions, it is essential to explore their beliefs about human beings and the concept of death. According to the Christian worldview, human beings are created in the image of God, with inherent dignity and worth. They are not merely physical beings but also possess a spiritual essence (John 4:24). Therefore, one’s decisions regarding the end of life should be guided by respect for this intrinsic value.
Moreover, Christians believe in life after death, where individuals face the judgment of God. Death is seen as a transition from the earthly realm to an eternal existence, either in the presence of God (heaven) or apart from Him (hell) (Matthew 25:46). This understanding of death shapes the moral framework for end-of-life decisions within the Christian worldview.
Worldview Question 2: What is the nature of the external reality, that is, the world around us?
The Christian worldview recognizes an external reality created by God. This reality encompasses both the physical and spiritual dimensions. From a Christian perspective, the physical world is not the ultimate reality but is subject to the will of God. Therefore, decisions regarding end-of-life care should consider the divine intent for creation.
Furthermore, Christians believe that all aspects of life, including suffering, have redemptive potential, as exemplified in the life and death of Jesus. This perspective on suffering and redemption influences the ethical analysis of George’s decision.
Worldview Question 3: What is a human being’s place in the world?
From a Christian worldview, human beings are seen as stewards of creation. They have a responsibility to respect and care for the world around them, as it is God’s creation. This understanding of humans’ place in the world implies a duty to make decisions that align with God’s intentions, including end-of-life choices.
Additionally, Christians are called to love their neighbors as themselves (Matthew 22:39). This commandment encompasses caring for others’ well-being and acknowledges the interconnectedness of individuals within communities. Consequently, George’s decision should consider the impact on his loved ones and the wider community.
Ethical Analysis of George’s Decision
Based on the Christian worldview and the insight gained from the previous worldview questions, an ethical analysis of George’s decision can be conducted.
Respecting Human Dignity and God’s Image
The Christian worldview emphasizes the inherent dignity and worth of every human being. This includes recognizing the image of God present within each individual. George’s decision should, therefore, reflect a commitment to honoring and preserving human dignity in the face of terminal illness.
By choosing the clinical trial, George demonstrates a desire to fight for his life. This decision aligns with the Christian worldview’s respect for the sanctity of life. However, it is essential to consider whether the clinical trial offers a reasonable chance of a cure or significant improvement. If the trial is unlikely to provide substantial benefit and only prolongs suffering, it may not be compatible with preserving human dignity.
On the other hand, comfort care acknowledges the reality of the terminal illness and focuses on providing physical and emotional support. This approach aligns with the Christian understanding of death as a transition to eternity, where pain may be a part of the redemptive process. Choosing comfort care can be seen as accepting God’s will and aligning with His plan for redemption.
Considering the Impact on Others
George’s decision also needs to consider the impact on his loved ones and the wider community, as per the Christian responsibility to love one’s neighbor. Participating in the clinical trial may cause emotional distress to his family, knowing that George is potentially subjecting himself to additional suffering. It may also burden the healthcare system and utilize resources that could be allocated to others in need. Conversely, comfort care allows George to focus on his relationships and the emotional support necessary for himself and his loved ones during this difficult time.
Conclusion
An ethical analysis of George’s end-of-life decision from the perspective of the Christian worldview highlights important considerations. This examination demonstrates the significance of respecting human dignity, considering the redemptive potential of suffering, and incorporating the well-being of others. The Christian worldview’s emphasis on the sanctity of life and love for one’s neighbor provides guidance for navigating complex ethical dilemmas like George’s. By evaluating the case study through this lens, it becomes evident that the decision between a clinical trial and comfort care requires careful consideration of these moral principles.