Based on your readings, compare and contrast (view any similarities or differences between) the theories of Dr. Marth Rogers and Dr. Rosemarie Rizzo Parse’s theories. Which one would you prefer for your nursing practice and why? Textbook: Smith, M. & Parker, M. (2014). Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company. ISBN-13: 978-0-8036-3312-4 I’m asking for 250 words. Plagiarism free. APA 7th ed. required. Please use 2 scholarly references. Attach plagiarism report. Due date: Monday, feb 15 @8pm
Comparing and contrasting nursing theories is an essential task in understanding the different perspectives and approaches to nursing practice. In this paper, we will analyze the theories of Dr. Martha Rogers and Dr. Rosemarie Rizzo Parse, examining their similarities and differences, and ultimately determining which theory would be preferred for nursing practice.
Dr. Martha Rogers was a renowned nursing theorist known for her groundbreaking Science of Unitary Human Beings. Central to Roger’s theory is the concept of “unitary human beings,” which posits that humans are integral entities with an interconnectedness to the environment. Roger’s theory focuses on the energy fields that surround and permeate the human body, highlighting the dynamic and holistic nature of human experience. She believed that nursing should promote harmony and balance within these energy fields, supporting individuals in achieving their maximum potential for health and well-being.
In contrast, Dr. Rosemarie Rizzo Parse developed the Theory of Human Becoming, which emphasizes the dynamic nature of human beings as they constantly interact with the world. Parse suggests that nursing should focus on supporting individuals in their own personal journey of becoming, rather than attempting to alter or control their experiences. The Theory of Human Becoming places great importance on the individual’s subjective experiences and values, encouraging nurses to explore and understand each patient’s unique perspective.
Although their theories differ in several aspects, both Rogers and Parse emphasize the holistic nature of human beings and the need for nurses to consider the interconnectedness of individuals with their environment. Both theorists acknowledge the complex interaction between physical, emotional, social, and spiritual dimensions of human health and well-being. Furthermore, both theories highlight the importance of individualized care, recognizing that each person has unique needs and experiences that should be considered.
One potential similarity between Rogers and Parse is their recognition of the importance of the nurse-patient relationship. Both theorists stress the significance of establishing a therapeutic alliance built on trust, respect, and open communication. In both theories, the nurse becomes a partner in the patient’s healing journey, supporting and guiding them in achieving their optimal state of health.
However, there are also notable differences between the two theories. Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings places a strong emphasis on the concept of energy fields and the interconnectedness of all things, while Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming focuses more on the individual’s subjective experience and journey of becoming. Rogers’ theory adopts a more scientific and systematic approach to nursing practice, whereas Parse’s theory leans towards a more subjective and phenomenological perspective.
In terms of preference for nursing practice, the choice between Rogers’ theory and Parse’s theory depends on the nurse’s personal beliefs, values, and the context of the nursing practice. Rogers’ theory may be more suitable for nurses who prioritize a scientific and holistic approach, focusing on the interconnectedness of individuals with their environment. This theory may be particularly applicable in critical care settings or situations where patients require intense monitoring and intervention.
On the other hand, Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming may be preferred by nurses who value individualized care and the exploration of patients’ unique experiences. This theory may be more applicable in community health settings, mental health settings, or situations where patients require support in exploring their own values and meaning in life.
In conclusion, Dr. Martha Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings and Dr. Rosemarie Rizzo Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming offer distinct perspectives on nursing practice. While both emphasize the holistic nature of human beings and the importance of the nurse-patient relationship, they differ in their approaches and focus. The preference for one theory over the other ultimately depends on the nurse’s personal beliefs, values, and the specific context of the nursing practice.