Choose one of the primary source documents from the topic list below. Using the primary source reading, answer the following questions. Use this template provided to complete the assignment. Bush, G. H. (1990). Iraqi Aggression in Kuwait. Speech before the United Nations General Assembly. ( ) Buchanan, P. J. (1992). Address to the Republican National Convention. Retrieved from American Yawp Reagan, R. (1987). Tear Down this Wall. Retrieved from The History Place: Great Speeches Collection:
Title: Analysis of President George H. W. Bush’s Speech on Iraqi Aggression in Kuwait
Introduction:
This analysis will examine President George H. W. Bush’s speech before the United Nations General Assembly in 1990 on Iraqi aggression in Kuwait. The speech, delivered during the aftermath of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, serves as a primary source that sheds light on President Bush’s perspective and the United States’ response to this crisis. By critically analyzing the content and rhetoric used in the speech, we can gain a deeper understanding of the historical circumstances and the motivations behind US foreign policy decisions during this period.
Summary:
In his speech, President Bush condemns Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait as a blatant act of aggression and a threat to the global community’s security and stability. He emphasizes the importance of international cooperation and collective action to address this violation of the United Nations Charter, which he deems a fundamental principle of the post-World War II international order. President Bush seeks to rally support for a coalition of nations to confront the Iraqi regime, demanding the complete and unconditional withdrawal of Iraqi forces from Kuwait.
Analysis:
1. Rhetorical Devices:
President Bush utilizes various rhetorical devices in his speech to articulate his arguments effectively. One such device is the use of emotive language to create an emotional response in the audience. For example, he refers to Iraq’s invasion as “a naked act of aggression” and “a brutal and cynical course of conquest.” These strong words serve to portray the seriousness of the situation and evoke a sense of moral outrage.
Furthermore, President Bush employs the rhetorical strategy of repetition throughout his address. He repeatedly emphasizes phrases such as “This aggression will not stand” and “We will not appease aggression.” This repetition reinforces his firm stance against Iraqi aggression and underscores the notion that the United States will not tolerate such violations of international norms.
2. Appeals to International Law and Collective Security:
President Bush heavily relies on appeals to international law and collective security as the basis for the United States’ response to the Iraqi invasion. He repeatedly cites the United Nations Charter and its fundamental principle of respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity. By doing so, he seeks to legitimize the actions of the United States and its allies as a necessary and justified response to an international breach of peace and security.
Moreover, President Bush highlights the importance of collective security in addressing such acts of aggression. He symbolically places the United States as part of a broader international community and seeks to build a coalition of nations to confront Iraq. This emphasis on collective action reinforces the notion that the United States’ response is not unilateral but rather a collective endeavor to restore international order and deter future aggression.
3. Use of Historical References:
President Bush incorporates historical references to strengthen his arguments and appeal to a shared sense of history. He draws parallels between Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait and previous historical instances of aggression, such as Nazi Germany’s annexation of neighboring territories leading up to World War II. This comparison serves to evoke a powerful historical analogy and reinforces the gravity of Iraq’s actions, thereby justifying the need for a unified stance against their aggression.
4. Diplomatic Alternatives:
While President Bush’s speech emphasizes the United States’ determination to counter Iraq’s aggression, he also mentions the exploration of diplomatic alternatives. He acknowledges the possibility of peaceful resolution but asserts that it depends on Iraq’s willingness to comply with international demands. This suggests that the United States, despite its firm stance, remains open to non-military solutions and is willing to work towards a peaceful resolution if Iraq displays a genuine commitment to international law and the restoration of Kuwait’s sovereignty.
Conclusion:
President George H. W. Bush’s speech on Iraqi Aggression in Kuwait is a significant primary source that offers insight into US foreign policy during the Gulf War. Through the analysis of rhetorical devices, appeals to international law and collective security, use of historical references, and references to diplomatic alternatives, we can discern the motivations and strategies behind the United States’ response. This analysis underscores the importance of studying primary sources to gain a comprehensive understanding of historical events and the decision-making processes that shape the course of international relations.