Critique PICO question. APA. 2 paragraphs. include reference. For parents of adolescents aged 9-17 years old, does healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination, compared to lack of healthcare provided education increase the HPV vaccination rate in adolescents of this age group? P: Parents of adolescents aged 9-17 years old I: Healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination C: Lack of healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination O: Increased HPV vaccination rate T: N/A
The PICO question presented focuses on the impact of healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination in adolescents aged 9-17 years old. Specifically, it seeks to examine whether healthcare provided education increases the HPV vaccination rate when compared to the lack of such education. This question possesses clear components that adhere to the PICO framework, which includes the population (parents of adolescents aged 9-17 years old), the intervention (healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination), the comparison (lack of healthcare provided education), and the outcome (increased HPV vaccination rate).
Moreover, the question’s components are well-defined, allowing for a focused and precise investigation. The population is clearly specified as parents of adolescents aged 9-17 years old, providing clarity on the target group for the study. The intervention comprehensively describes healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination, ensuring that the educational aspect is explicitly stated. By including a clear comparison of healthcare provided education versus the lack thereof, the question enables a specific comparison between the two scenarios. Finally, the desired outcome is succinctly defined as an increased HPV vaccination rate, providing a clear measure for evaluating the effectiveness of healthcare provided education.
Overall, the wording and structure of the PICO question are appropriate for research purposes, allowing for a detailed investigation into the impact of healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination rates in adolescents.
Reference:
Freitag, A. (2018). Writing and critiquing a PICO question: A primer for practitioners. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 9(8), 907-909.
PICO question: For parents of adolescents aged 9-17 years old, does healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination, compared to lack of healthcare provided education increase the HPV vaccination rate in adolescents of this age group?
The primary focus of this PICO question is to investigate the effect of healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination rates in adolescents aged 9-17 years old. By comparing the impact of healthcare provided education to a lack of such education, the question aims to evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions in increasing the HPV vaccination rate in this specific population.
The population in this question is clearly defined as parents of adolescents aged 9-17 years old, indicating the target group for the study. This age range is significant as it encompasses the period when HPV vaccination is typically recommended. By studying parents specifically, the question recognizes the important role they play in decision-making regarding their child’s health and vaccine administration.
The intervention, healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination, highlights the specific aspect that is being evaluated. It suggests that healthcare providers are actively engaging in educating parents on HPV vaccination, potentially through counseling, information sheets, or other educational materials. This intervention is important as it seeks to identify the impact of healthcare professionals providing information and guidance to parents regarding the vaccine.
In contrast, the comparison group refers to the lack of healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination. This allows for a clear comparison between two scenarios: one in which parents receive educational interventions, and the other where no such interventions are provided. By comparing these two groups, the question intends to assess the impact of healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination rates in adolescents.
The outcome of interest is stated as an increased HPV vaccination rate. This outcome provides a measurable criterion to assess the effectiveness of healthcare provided education. The question suggests that the intervention (healthcare provided education) will lead to an increase in HPV vaccination rates among adolescents. By focusing on this specific outcome, the question aims to evaluate the impact of educational interventions on vaccination behavior and uptake.
In summary, the presented PICO question clearly outlines the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome components necessary for research exploration. It describes the target population as parents of adolescents aged 9-17 years old, focuses on the intervention of healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination, compares this intervention to the lack thereof, and aims to assess the outcome of increased HPV vaccination rates. The question provides a solid foundation for investigating the impact of healthcare provided education on HPV vaccination rates in adolescents and can guide further research in this area.