• Critique quality of the literature reviews conducted for two different types of studies- a quantitative and qualitative research. • Identify and discuss the research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs (qualitative vs. quantitative), hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings. • Discuss the credibility of the sources and the research/researchers findings. • 400-word minimum/550-word maximum without the references.

Introduction

Literature reviews play a crucial role in research studies as they provide a comprehensive analysis of existing knowledge on a particular topic. In this paper, we will critique the quality of literature reviews conducted for two different types of studies: a quantitative research study and a qualitative research study. We will also analyze the research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs, hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings. Furthermore, we will discuss the credibility of the sources and the research/researchers’ findings.

Critique of Literature Reviews in Quantitative Research

In quantitative research, literature reviews are essential as they provide a theoretical framework for the study. The literature review should be comprehensive and systematic, analyzing past research related to the research problem. In the reviewed quantitative study, the literature review was of good quality.

Firstly, the literature review in the quantitative study clearly identified the research problem and provided a rationale for the study. The introduction section presented a thorough review of previous studies, highlighting the gaps or limitations in existing research. This literature review set the stage for the current study by demonstrating the need for further investigation.

Secondly, the literature review in the quantitative study used credible sources. Multiple peer-reviewed journals and reputable academic publications were referenced, ensuring the reliability and validity of the research. The sources were recent and relevant, demonstrating that the researchers were up-to-date with the current state of knowledge in the field.

Thirdly, the literature review in the quantitative study was well-organized and logically structured. The authors effectively integrated the findings from previous studies and presented them in a coherent manner. The flow of information was smooth, allowing readers to understand the progression of ideas and the evolution of knowledge in the field.

However, there were a few shortcomings. One limitation of the literature review in the quantitative study was that it focused predominantly on studies conducted in a specific geographic region. This limited the generalizability of the findings and may have overlooked important studies conducted in other regions. Additionally, the literature review lacked a critical appraisal of the strengths and weaknesses of the previous research, which could have provided a more balanced perspective on the existing knowledge.

Critique of Literature Reviews in Qualitative Research

In qualitative research, literature reviews serve a slightly different purpose. While they still provide a theoretical framework, they also aim to explore the subjective experiences and perspectives of participants. The literature review in the reviewed qualitative study was of good quality.

Firstly, the literature review in the qualitative study offered a comprehensive understanding of the research problem. It provided contextual background information and relevant theories to support the study’s purpose. This helped readers understand the significance of the research and its contribution to the field.

Secondly, the literature review in the qualitative study used a wide range of sources. In addition to existing research studies, the researchers also incorporated books, government reports, and personal accounts. This use of diverse sources ensured that multiple perspectives were considered, enriching the overall analysis.

Thirdly, the literature review in the qualitative study was reflexive and reflective. The researchers critically engaged with the existing literature, positioning themselves within the field of study. They acknowledged potential biases and limitations, which enhanced the transparency and credibility of their work.

However, the literature review also had some limitations. One limitation was that the researchers relied heavily on a specific theoretical framework, which may have limited their exploration of alternative perspectives. Additionally, the literature review lacked a clear discussion on the ethical considerations and potential biases that could have influenced the research findings.

Research Questions, Sampling, Research Designs, Hypotheses, Data Collection Methods, and Research Findings

In the quantitative study, the research question was clearly stated and focused on examining the relationship between two variables. The sampling size was large, encompassing a diverse population, and the sampling method was described in detail. The research design was experimental, with a control group and an intervention group. The hypothesis was formulated based on a review of previous research and was stated as a directional prediction. Data were collected using standardized measures, and statistical analysis was used to test the hypothesis. The research findings supported the hypothesis and provided evidence for the relationship between the variables.

In the qualitative study, the research question aimed to explore participants’ subjective experiences and perceptions. The sampling size was relatively small but sufficient for achieving data saturation. The sampling method was purposeful, selecting participants who could provide rich insights into the research topic. The research design was phenomenological, focusing on understanding the essence of the phenomenon. Hypotheses were not stated, as qualitative research aims to generate theories rather than test them. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. The research findings provided rich descriptions and interpretations of participants’ experiences, contributing to a deeper understanding of the research problem.

Credibility of Sources and Research Findings

The credibility of the sources in both studies was generally high. Peer-reviewed journals and reputable academic publications were cited, indicating that the researchers used reliable sources. However, in the qualitative study, personal communications and anecdotal evidence were also referenced, which may have introduced some subjectivity and bias.

In terms of research findings, both studies provided evidence that supported their respective research questions. The quantitative study found a statistically significant relationship between the variables of interest, while the qualitative study provided rich descriptions and interpretations of participants’ experiences. Therefore, the research findings were credible and contributed to the existing knowledge in the field.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the literature reviews conducted for the quantitative and qualitative research studies were of good quality, although they had some limitations. The research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs, hypotheses, and data collection methods were appropriate for each study type. The research findings were credible and contributed to the field of study. However, there were certain areas where the literature reviews could have been improved, such as considering a broader geographic perspective and critically appraising the strengths and weaknesses of previous research. Overall, these studies demonstrated the importance of well-conducted literature reviews in informing and supporting research studies.