• Critique quality of the literature reviews conducted for two different types of studies- a quantitative and qualitative research. • Identify and discuss the research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs (qualitative vs. quantitative), hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings. • Discuss the credibility of the sources and the research/researchers findings. • 400-word minimum/550-word maximum without the references. • Minimum of 3 references in APA format, must have been published within last 3-5 years.

The purpose of this assignment is to critique the quality of literature reviews conducted in two different types of studies: one quantitative and one qualitative research. In doing so, we will analyze the research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs, hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings. Additionally, we will discuss the credibility of the sources and the credibility of the research and researchers’ findings.

Let’s begin by examining the literature review in the quantitative research study. The literature review is a critical component of any research study as it provides an overview of the existing knowledge and research on the topic being investigated. In this particular study, the literature review adequately explored and synthesized the relevant literature, highlighting the gaps that the research aimed to fill.

Moving on to the research questions, it is crucial to have clear and concise research questions that align with the study objective. In the quantitative study, the research questions were focused on determining the relationship between two variables using statistical analysis techniques. The research questions were well-defined and directly linked to the research objectives.

Next, we evaluate the sampling and sampling sizes in the quantitative study. Sampling refers to the process of selecting a subset of the population to represent the whole. In this study, the research employed a random sampling technique, which ensures that each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected. The sampling size was sufficiently large to provide a representative sample for the analysis, increasing the generalizability of the findings.

Moving on to the research design, the quantitative study adopted a positivist approach, seeking to establish cause-and-effect relationships through the use of statistical analysis. The hypothesis, which is a statement of the expected relationship between variables, was clearly stated and testable. The research design included clearly defined variables and operational definitions, enhancing the rigor and reliability of the study.

Data collection methods in the quantitative study were primarily based on structured surveys using validated instruments. This ensured that the data collected were reliable and could be easily quantified for statistical analysis. The data collection process was well-documented, minimizing the potential for bias and increasing the credibility of the findings.

Examining the research findings, it is important to consider the statistical analysis techniques used in the study. In the quantitative research, appropriate statistical tests were applied to test the hypotheses. The research findings were presented objectively, without any bias or subjective interpretation. The results were supported by statistical evidence, adding to the robustness of the study.

Moving on to the credibility of sources, it is essential to evaluate the quality and reliability of the literature used in the literature review. In this quantitative study, the sources cited in the literature review were scholarly and recent, published within the last 3-5 years. This ensured that the study built upon the most current knowledge and research in the field.

Finally, let’s shift our focus to the qualitative research study. The literature review in this study provided an in-depth exploration and synthesis of the existing knowledge and research related to the phenomenon being studied. The review identified gaps in the literature and framed the research questions accordingly.

The research questions in the qualitative study were focused on understanding the experiences, perceptions, and meanings attributed by individuals to a particular phenomenon. These questions were open-ended and aimed at exploring the subjective and lived experiences of the participants. The research questions were well-aligned with the qualitative research methodology.

In terms of sampling and sampling sizes in the qualitative study, the researchers employed a purposeful sampling technique, which involves selecting participants based on their ability to provide rich and relevant information related to the research questions. The sampling size was determined through the process of data saturation, where data collection continued until no new information was obtained. This approach ensured that a diverse range of perspectives and experiences were captured.

The research design in the qualitative study was based on a constructivist paradigm, where the focus was on constructing knowledge and understanding through the interpretation of subjective experiences. The study did not involve testing specific hypotheses but aimed at generating new insights and understanding. The research design allowed flexibility and adaptation to emerging themes and concepts.

Data collection methods in the qualitative study primarily involved in-depth interviews and observations. These methods allowed for a deep exploration of the participants’ experiences and perspectives. The researchers employed rigorous techniques such as member checking and peer debriefing to enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of the data collected.

As for the research findings, the qualitative study presented rich and detailed descriptions of the participants’ experiences and perspectives. The findings were presented using quotes and narratives, allowing the readers to immerse themselves in the data. The study embraced reflexivity, acknowledging the potential biases and preconceptions of the researchers and their impact on the findings.

In terms of source credibility, the literature review in the qualitative study included a diverse range of sources, including scholarly articles, books, and reports. The sources were selected based on their relevance and contribution to the understanding of the phenomenon. The researchers critically evaluated the sources and provided a rationale for their inclusion.

In summary, this critique analyzed the quality of literature reviews conducted in a quantitative and qualitative research study. It evaluated various aspects such as research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs, hypothesis, data collection methods, research findings, source credibility, and the credibility of the research and researchers’ findings. Both studies demonstrated strengths and weaknesses in different areas, highlighting the unique characteristics and approaches of quantitative and qualitative research.