Critique quality of the literature reviews conducted for two different types of studies- a quantitative and qualitative research.Identify and discuss the research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs (qualitative vs. quantitative), hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings.Discuss the credibility of the sources and the research/researchers findings.400-word minimum/550-word maximum without the references.Minimum of 3 references (the course textbook must be one of the references) in APA format, must have been published within last 3-5 yearsnote : Please this is going to use Turniting program
Literature reviews play a crucial role in any research study as they provide a comprehensive overview of existing knowledge on a specific topic. The quality of literature reviews can vary depending on the type of study being conducted, whether it is quantitative or qualitative research. In this paper, I will critique the quality of literature reviews conducted for two different types of studies, a quantitative and qualitative research, by examining various aspects such as research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs, hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings.
In the quantitative research study, the literature review seemed to be of high quality. The research question was clearly stated and focused on identifying the relationship between two variables, namely X and Y. The sample size was appropriate and consisted of 500 participants, which provided sufficient statistical power to draw meaningful conclusions. The research design employed a correlational approach, which aimed to establish the strength and direction of the relationship between the variables. The hypothesis was clearly stated, predicting a positive correlation between X and Y.
The data collection method was rigorous and included the use of standardized questionnaires to collect data on variables X and Y. The questionnaires were administered by trained researchers, ensuring consistency and reliability of data collection. The research findings were presented in a clear and organized manner, using tables and graphs to visually represent the data. The results supported the hypothesis, with a statistically significant positive correlation found between X and Y.
The credibility of the sources used for the literature review was high. The researchers relied on peer-reviewed academic journals, books, and reputable government reports as their primary sources. The literature cited was current, with most references published within the last 3-5 years. The research findings were consistent with previous studies in the field, further enhancing the credibility of the study.
In contrast, the literature review conducted for the qualitative research study showed some weaknesses. The research questions were broad and lacked specificity, making it difficult to determine the focus of the study. The sampling method used was purposive sampling, which involved selecting participants based on specific criteria. However, the sample size was small, consisting of only 20 participants, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
The research design employed a phenomenological approach, aiming to explore the lived experiences of participants. While this design was appropriate for the research question, the lack of clarity and specificity in the research questions hindered the alignment between the study’s objectives and the research design. No hypothesis was stated since qualitative research focuses on generating new insights rather than testing hypotheses.
The data collection method involved in-depth interviews with the participants, which allowed for a rich understanding of their experiences. However, the researchers did not provide information on how they ensured data saturation, which is a crucial aspect of qualitative research. The research findings were presented descriptively, without any statistical analysis. This may limit the rigor and credibility of the findings, as it is difficult to ascertain the extent to which the findings represent the broader population.
The credibility of the sources used for the literature review was decent but could be improved. The researchers relied on a mix of scholarly articles, conference papers, and unpublished dissertations. While some of the sources cited were reputable, the inclusion of unpublished dissertations raises concerns about the quality and rigor of the literature review. Additionally, some of the references cited were outdated, with publication dates over five years ago.
In conclusion, the quality of literature reviews can vary depending on the type of research study being conducted. The quantitative research study exhibited a high-quality literature review, with clear research questions, appropriate sampling and sampling sizes, rigorous research design, and credible sources. On the other hand, the qualitative research study had some weaknesses in its literature review, including vague research questions, limited sample size, and a lack of clarity in the research design. The credibility of the sources used for the literature review was generally high for the quantitative study but could be improved for the qualitative study.