Describe a survey, instrument, or tool that you plan to use in your project. Describe the tool in terms of name, number of items, how it is answered (Likert scale, yes/no, open answers, etc.), and the total score. Describe the level of measurement for this instrument. Support with references. 1 page, APA. Use of Advanced Practice Providers in triage in improving waiting times in Emergency departments.
Title: Survey on the Use of Advanced Practice Providers in Triage to Improve Waiting Times in Emergency Departments
Introduction:
The goal of this study is to investigate the use of Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) in triage as a strategy to improve waiting times in Emergency Departments (EDs). To achieve this objective, a survey instrument will be utilized to gather data on the current implementation and effectiveness of APPs in triage. This paper describes the survey in terms of its name, number of items, response format, scoring system, and level of measurement.
Survey Instrument:
The survey instrument to be used in this study is named “Assessment of Advanced Practice Providers in Triage” (AAPPT). It is a self-report questionnaire that has been specifically developed for evaluating the implementation and impact of APPs in emergency triage settings. The AAPPT consists of 30 items, which are designed to capture various dimensions related to APPs’ roles, responsibilities, and perceived effectiveness in improving waiting times in EDs.
Response Format:
The AAPPT employs a Likert-scale response format, which allows participants to rate their agreement or disagreement with each statement on a 5-point scale. The scale ranges from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree.” Participants are instructed to select the most appropriate response that reflects their opinion or experience regarding the item being assessed.
Scoring System:
For data analysis purposes, a scoring system will be applied to the AAPPT responses. Each item in the AAPPT is assigned a numerical value from 1 to 5, with 1 representing “Strongly Disagree” and 5 representing “Strongly Agree.” The scores for each item will be summed up to obtain a total score for each participant. The total score will provide an overall assessment of participants’ perceptions and attitudes towards the utilization of APPs in triage.
Level of Measurement:
The AAPPT utilizes a Likert-scale response format, which falls under the category of ordinal measurement. Ordinal measurement is characterized by categories that have a defined order but do not necessarily have an equal distance between them. In the case of the AAPPT, the Likert-scale responses capture the degree of agreement or disagreement, providing a rank order of participants’ attitudes or perceptions. However, the interval between the response options is not necessarily uniform.
The use of the Likert scale as a measurement tool has been widely accepted and extensively used in social sciences research (Babbie, 2016). It provides valuable quantitative data that can be analyzed using statistical techniques such as means, frequencies, and correlations. Furthermore, ordinal data allows for the identification of patterns and trends within the responses, providing insight into participants’ perceptions of the utilization of APPs in triage.
Conclusion:
The “Assessment of Advanced Practice Providers in Triage” (AAPPT) survey instrument is an essential tool for gathering data on the current implementation and effectiveness of APPs in improving waiting times in Emergency Departments. With its 30-item Likert-scale format, the AAPPT provides a structured approach to capturing participants’ perceptions and attitudes. The utilization of a scoring system allows for the calculation of a total score, enabling a comprehensive analysis of participants’ responses. The level of measurement for the AAPPT is ordinal, which provides valuable information for assessing patterns and trends within the data.
References:
Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research. Cengage Learning.