I need it by 6pm EST December 5, 2018. Please follow all instructions. For this assignment: Using the information accessed from this site, write a four- to five-page paper (excluding title and reference pages) in which you assess this information and discuss your reactions and opposing viewpoints on the issues. The paper must be in APA style

Title: Analysis of Climate Change: Assessing Information and Diverse Perspectives

Introduction:

Climate change is a global issue that continues to generate widespread concern due to its potential effects on ecosystems, human health, and socio-economic conditions. The scientific consensus is that the Earth’s climate is changing primarily due to human activities, especially the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs). However, this topic remains controversial, with opposition asserting alternative viewpoints.

This paper aims to assess information related to climate change and discuss various reactions and opposing viewpoints on the issue. By critically analyzing a range of perspectives, the objective is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic and foster an open dialogue that acknowledges diverse viewpoints.

Scientific Consensus on Climate Change:

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), established by the United Nations, is a leading authority on climate change. Their reports have consistently highlighted the unequivocal finding of human-induced climate change. Based on extensive research and data analysis, the IPCC concludes that GHG emissions from human activities, such as burning fossil fuels and deforestation, are the main drivers of climate change.

The scientific consensus, as reflected in the IPCC reports, is supported by multiple lines of evidence from diverse fields, including atmospheric physics, paleoclimatology, and satellite observations. These findings provide a robust foundation for understanding climate change and its causes.

Opposing Viewpoints:

Despite the overwhelming consensus among scientists, there are opposing viewpoints that challenge the human-induced climate change narrative. It is important to acknowledge and address these alternative perspectives to present a comprehensive analysis.

One common viewpoint disputes the accuracy and credibility of climate change models, suggesting they are flawed and unreliable. Critics argue that climate models cannot accurately predict future temperature changes or extreme weather events. While it is true that models have inherent limitations, they are valuable tools that help scientists understand and project climate trends based on available data and scientific understanding.

Another opposing viewpoint questions the extent of human influence on climate change. Skeptics argue that natural variations in climate, such as volcanic activity and solar radiation, play a more significant role than human activities. While natural factors do indeed influence climate patterns, scientific research consistently demonstrates that the rapid increase in GHG emissions from human activities has been the dominant cause of global warming over the past century.

Reactions and Counterarguments:

When assessing the information on climate change, it is essential to examine the reactions and counterarguments to these opposing viewpoints. Addressing concerns and engaging in constructive discussions can enhance our understanding of the issue and potentially bridge the gap between differing perspectives.

In response to the doubts raised about climate models, proponents argue that models are continually being refined and improved through a combination of new observational data, increased computational power, and better understanding of climate processes. While uncertainties exist, models have proven to be valuable tools for projecting future climate scenarios and informing policy decisions.

Regarding the debate on human influence, the consensus among researchers is that natural variations alone cannot account for the observed warming trend. The rapid increase in atmospheric GHG concentrations, attributed mainly to human activities, aligns with the timing and magnitude of temperature changes. Additionally, studies that separate the distinct contributions of natural and anthropogenic factors confirm that human activities are the primary driver of recent climate change.

Conclusion:

Assessing information and considering diverse viewpoints on climate change is crucial for arriving at a comprehensive understanding of the issue. While the scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the human-induced climate change narrative, addressing opposing viewpoints fosters a more inclusive and informed discussion. By critically analyzing the information available, engaging in constructive debates, and acknowledging the limitations and uncertainties in the field, society can make informed decisions and take effective action to mitigate and adapt to the challenges posed by climate change.