Identify two(  )Library scholarly databases that will help you find the best research articles to support your capstone project change proposal. Discuss why these two databases are better than Google Scholar or a general Internet search. The Institute of Medicine has stated a goal that 90% of practice be evidence-based by 2020.  According to HealthyPeople.gov, the United States is currently at approximately 15%. Discuss two barriers that might hold nursing practice from achieving this goal and suggest ways in which identified barriers may be addressed.

Library scholarly databases are crucial tools for finding high-quality research articles to support a capstone project change proposal. Compared to general Internet searches or platforms like Google Scholar, these databases offer several advantages in terms of reliability, relevance, and the quality of available literature. Two highly recommended library scholarly databases are PubMed and CINAHL.

PubMed is a comprehensive resource provided by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). It primarily focuses on biomedical literature and provides access to a vast collection of peer-reviewed journal articles from various biomedical fields, including nursing. PubMed stands out as a reliable database because it is curated and maintained by expert librarians and subject specialists. Articles indexed on PubMed undergo a rigorous review process to ensure quality and accuracy. Moreover, PubMed also incorporates MeSH (Medical Subject Headings), a controlled vocabulary that enhances the precision and effectiveness of search results. This indexing feature makes it easier for researchers to find articles specifically related to their research topic. Additionally, PubMed provides links to full-text articles wherever available, which is advantageous for accessing the complete contents of relevant research papers.

CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) is another exemplary database that focuses on nursing and allied health research literature. CINAHL is widely recognized for its extensive coverage of nursing-focused journals and other publications. It encompasses a range of subjects within the nursing discipline, such as healthcare administration, healthcare policy, patient care, and nursing education. CINAHL offers a sophisticated search interface with various search options, allowing researchers to refine their queries based on specific criteria such as publication type, research methodology, or clinical setting. This flexibility enables researchers to identify articles that align closely with their capstone project change proposal. CINAHL also provides access to full-text articles, enhancing the convenience and comprehensiveness of research findings.

These two databases, PubMed and CINAHL, surpass general Internet searches or Google Scholar in multiple ways. While Google Scholar indeed retrieves a significant number of results, it lacks the advanced search features and filtering options that are crucial for conducting systematic literature reviews. Library scholarly databases like PubMed and CINAHL are purpose-built for scholarly research, ensuring that the results are from reputable and peer-reviewed publications. The rigor of the review process and the curated nature of these databases ensure the inclusion of high-quality, evidence-based articles, which are essential for supporting a capstone project change proposal.

Moreover, general Internet searches may yield an overwhelming amount of information, much of which may not be reliable or relevant to the research topic. Library databases, on the other hand, offer a curated and focused collection of scholarly literature, saving researchers time and effort in sifting through irrelevant or unsubstantiated information. Additionally, the advanced search features in library databases, like the MeSH indexing in PubMed and refined search options in CINAHL, enable researchers to precisely locate articles that are specifically related to their area of interest.

Furthermore, the credibility and authority of library scholarly databases are much higher than most websites found through general Internet searches. The articles indexed in these databases have passed through a stringent peer-review process, ensuring that the information is accurate, credible, and of high quality. General Internet searches, by contrast, may lead to unreliable sources or websites that lack the rigorous review processes characteristic of scholarly literature.

In conclusion, library scholarly databases, such as PubMed and CINAHL, are valuable resources for finding research articles to support a capstone project change proposal. Compared to general Internet searches or Google Scholar, these databases provide more reliable, relevant, and high-quality literature. The rigorous review processes, curated collections, advanced search features, and focus on scholarly research make these databases indispensable tools for evidence-based nursing practice and achieving the Institute of Medicine’s goal of 90% evidence-based practice by 2020.

Do you need us to help you on this or any other assignment?


Make an Order Now