Please remember the grading rubric for discussion posts. It is consistent with application in research related to its context. Clarity of ideas. The topic has a partially weak association to the clarity of ideas and related topics. The tone is consistent, addressed professionally and objectively. Evidence in literature supports arguments. The tone is not consistently objective. Partially poor evidence in the review of the literature. Consistent clarity and supported by research evidence. Partially lack clarity or lack of support with research evidence. Dr. Davis 1

In order to fully understand the grading rubric for discussion posts, it is important to consider its application in research. The rubric is designed to assess the clarity of ideas presented in the post and the extent to which they are supported by evidence from the literature.

One aspect of the rubric is the assessment of the association between the topic and the clarity of ideas. This means that the topic chosen for the discussion post should have a clear and strong connection to the ideas being presented. If the association is partially weak, it suggests that there may be some ambiguity or lack of coherence in the post.

Another aspect of the rubric is the evaluation of the tone in which the ideas are addressed. The tone should be professional and objective throughout the post. This means that the post should be written in a formal and unbiased manner, without any personal or emotional bias. If the tone is inconsistent, it implies that there may be moments where the author’s personal opinions or perspectives are seeping into the post.

The rubric also takes into consideration the use of evidence from the literature to support arguments presented in the post. It is expected that the post will refer to relevant scholarly sources and demonstrate an understanding of the current literature on the topic. If there is partial poor evidence provided in the review of the literature, it suggests that there may be gaps in the author’s understanding or interpretation of the existing research.

Clarity and support with research evidence are two key components of a well-written discussion post. The ideas presented should be clear and easy to understand, with a logical flow of thought. Additionally, these ideas should be supported by research evidence, which can be in the form of citations from relevant studies or other scholarly sources. If there is a lack of clarity or lack of support with research evidence, it indicates that the post may be confusing or lacking substance.

Overall, the grading rubric for discussion posts in research-related contexts is designed to assess the clarity of ideas, the tone of the post, and the extent to which arguments are supported by evidence from the literature. By considering these criteria, both students and instructors can ensure that the discussion posts are of high quality and contribute to the scholarly conversation on the given topic. In summary, the rubric provides specific guidelines for evaluating the clarity, tone, and evidence in literature of discussion posts in a research context.