Research the 2008 presidential debate. Using Internet resources, research script or video materials from the final 2008 presidential debate between Barack Obama and John McCain. The debate took place on October 15, 2008, and was hosted by Hofstra University in Hempstead, NY. Watch the entire debate, and pay close attention to the argument forms and support provided by the speakers. In your original post, analyze the debate and address the following questions relating to the dialogue. Read and respond to two other students’ posts by Friday 11:59
The 2008 presidential debate between Barack Obama and John McCain was a pivotal moment in American political history. The debate, which took place on October 15, 2008, at Hofstra University in Hempstead, NY, was the final showdown between the two candidates before the election. It was a highly anticipated event, with millions of viewers tuning in to watch the candidates present their arguments and ideas.
In analyzing the debate, it is essential to pay close attention to the argument forms and support provided by the speakers. Both Obama and McCain utilized various rhetorical strategies to convey their messages and appeal to the audience. As this debate was held during a time of economic crisis and a contentious war in Iraq, the candidates’ arguments focused heavily on these issues.
One recurring argument form used by both candidates was the appeal to authority. Throughout the debate, Obama and McCain referenced the opinions and endorsements of respected individuals and organizations to support their claims. For example, Obama cited the support of former Secretary of State Colin Powell, who had recently endorsed him, to bolster his stance on foreign policy. McCain, on the other hand, often referred to the opinions of military leaders to strengthen his argument on national security.
Another argument form employed by the candidates was the appeal to emotion. Both Obama and McCain attempted to connect with the audience on a personal level, appealing to their emotions to convey their message effectively. For instance, Obama frequently spoke about the struggles of everyday Americans, using anecdotes and personal stories to elicit empathy from the viewers. McCain, on the other hand, emphasized his own military experience and the sacrifices he had made, aiming to evoke a sense of patriotism and trust in his leadership.
Furthermore, both candidates utilized the argument form of logical reasoning. They presented their arguments in a structured and logical manner, using evidence and reasoning to support their claims. For example, Obama often provided statistical data and expert analysis to back up his policy proposals. McCain, on the other hand, relied heavily on his own experience and knowledge of foreign affairs to make his case.
In terms of support, both candidates used a combination of anecdotal evidence, statistical data, expert opinions, and personal experience to reinforce their arguments. They often referenced their own track records and past accomplishments to establish credibility and authority. Additionally, both candidates relied on specific examples and case studies to illustrate the impact of their proposed policies.
It is important to note that while both candidates employed various argument forms and support, their styles and approaches differed significantly. Obama was known for his calm and composed demeanor, often using measured language and thoughtful arguments. He focused on his vision for change and presented himself as a unifying figure. McCain, on the other hand, was known for his passion and intensity. He often used strong and forceful language to convey his determination and combativeness.
In conclusion, the 2008 presidential debate between Barack Obama and John McCain showcased a variety of argument forms and support. Both candidates used appeals to authority, emotion, and logical reasoning to make their case to the audience. They relied on personal experiences, statistical data, and expert opinions to support their arguments effectively. The differences in their styles and approaches added to the dynamic nature of the debate. Overall, this debate played a significant role in shaping the narrative of the 2008 presidential election and provided voters with a critical insight into the policy proposals and leadership styles of the candidates.