This is a discussion post, ABOUT , tittle page not require In- text citation is required original work please, are required for this assignment, . Identify two GCU Library scholarly databases that will help you find the best research articles to support your EBP proposal. Discuss why these two databases are better than Google Scholar or a general Internet search. Use a library database such as Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it
Title: Scholarly Databases for Evidence-Based Practice Research
Introduction:
In the field of evidence-based practice (EBP), it is essential to access high-quality research articles to support the formulation of proposals and decision-making processes. While Google Scholar and general internet searches may provide a vast amount of information, they might not always be the most reliable or well-curated sources for scholarly articles. In this discussion, we will identify and evaluate two scholarly databases available through the GCU Library that will be more beneficial for researching articles related to EBP than Google Scholar or general internet searches.
Database 1: CINAHL Complete
CINAHL Complete is an essential scholarly database for nursing and healthcare professionals. It provides access to a wide range of research articles, journals, and other academic resources, specifically tailored to the field of nursing. With its extensive collection of nursing literature, CINAHL Complete helps researchers find relevant articles that specialize in evidence-based practice, nursing interventions, and clinical guidelines. This database also includes systematic reviews and meta-analyses, providing a higher level of evidence for supporting EBP proposals.
One of the significant advantages of using CINAHL Complete over Google Scholar is its focus on nursing-specific research. Researchers can be confident in the relevance and accuracy of the articles found in this database, as they are reviewed and indexed by experts within the nursing field. In contrast, Google Scholar may include studies from various disciplines that might not be as applicable or reliable for nursing EBP proposals. CINAHL Complete’s advanced search features, such as limiting searches to peer-reviewed articles and publication dates, help researchers quickly identify the most recent and reputable sources.
Database 2: PubMed
PubMed, another reliable scholarly database, predominantly focuses on the biomedical and life sciences field. It offers access to a vast collection of research articles, including those related to evidence-based medicine (EBM). PubMed database contains articles from various sources, such as academic journals, clinical guidelines, and research papers, making it an excellent choice for finding evidence to support EBP proposals.
PubMed provides multiple unique features that make it superior to Google Scholar for EBP research. Firstly, PubMed incorporates the MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) system, which assists researchers in refining their search terms and locating articles with precise relevancy. MeSH terms help navigate through the extensive database efficiently, leading to more specific and accurate search results compared to Google Scholar’s general keyword-based searches.
Secondly, PubMed indexes articles from highly reputable journals and undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, ensuring the quality and reliability of the content. This is in contrast to Google Scholar, which includes a wide range of sources, including non-peer-reviewed content, making it more challenging to discern the validity and credibility of the information found.
Furthermore, PubMed offers advanced search filters, such as study types (e.g., randomized controlled trials, cohort studies), publication dates, and article types (e.g., systematic reviews, meta-analyses), to assist researchers in narrowing down their search and ensuring they find the most robust evidence for their EBP proposals. These features provide researchers with a higher level of confidence in the articles they retrieve, making PubMed a preferred choice over Google Scholar for EBP research.
Conclusion:
When conducting research for evidence-based practice proposals, it is crucial to utilize scholarly databases that provide high-quality and relevant articles. CINAHL Complete and PubMed, available through the GCU Library, offer powerful tools and resources specifically tailored to nursing and healthcare professionals. These databases focus on peer-reviewed articles, offer advanced search features, and ensure the credibility of their sources. Compared to Google Scholar and general internet searches, these databases provide researchers with more accurate, relevant, and reliable evidence to support their EBP proposals. Therefore, it is recommended to explore the rich resources available in CINAHL Complete and PubMed for comprehensive EBP research.