Translation of a research-based intervention to practice involves a critical review of numerous published research studies to discern if individuals – research subjects – were treated according to the ethical values and principles as defined by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Reflect upon your selected practice problem and the eventual research-based intervention you select for your practice change project and address the following. Purchase the answer to view it
The process of translating research-based interventions into practice is a complex and multidimensional task that requires a critical review of various published research studies. This review aims to determine whether the individuals who participated in these studies were treated in accordance with the ethical values and principles outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
When contemplating a selected practice problem for a research-based intervention, it is crucial to consider the ethical implications and adhere to the regulations set forth by the CFR. The CFR is a comprehensive set of regulations that aims to protect the rights and welfare of research subjects and establish guidelines for the conduct of research involving human subjects. Adhering to these regulations is essential to ensure the ethical treatment of individuals, preserve their autonomy, and safeguard their privacy and confidentiality.
One example of a practice problem that may require the implementation of a research-based intervention is the high prevalence of medication errors in healthcare settings. Medication errors can have severe consequences on patient safety and quality of care, making it a significant issue that requires attention and improvement. A research-based intervention may involve the implementation of technology-driven systems, such as computerized physician order entry (CPOE) or barcode medication administration (BCMA), to reduce the occurrence of medication errors.
When assessing the ethical aspects of a research-based intervention for this practice problem, several considerations should be taken into account. Firstly, the research studies that have investigated the efficacy and safety of these interventions should be critically reviewed to ascertain whether the research subjects were treated in a manner consistent with the ethical values and principles of the CFR.
Key ethical principles to consider include informed consent, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and respect for autonomy. Informed consent implies that research subjects are fully informed about the purpose, procedures, possible risks and benefits, and their right to withdraw from the study at any time without repercussions. Beneficence and nonmaleficence require that the potential benefits of the intervention outweigh any potential harm or risk to the research subjects. Lastly, respect for autonomy requires that individuals have the right to make informed decisions about their participation in research and have their privacy and confidentiality protected.
In the case of implementing CPOE or BCMA systems, it is essential to ensure that the studies demonstrating their effectiveness have taken these ethical considerations into account. For example, did the researchers obtain informed consent from the participants before implementing the intervention? Were the potential benefits and risks adequately explained to the participants? Additionally, what measures were taken to protect the privacy and confidentiality of the research subjects? These are important questions that need to be addressed when evaluating the ethical implications of a research-based intervention.
Moreover, it is imperative to assess whether the research studies adhere to the specific regulations outlined in the CFR. For instance, the CFR requires the establishment of an Institutional Review Board (IRB) to review and approve the research protocol, including the ethical aspects of the study. The IRB plays a critical role in protecting the rights and welfare of research subjects and ensuring that the research is conducted in compliance with the regulatory guidelines. Therefore, it is crucial to determine whether the studies evaluating the selected research-based intervention obtained the necessary approval from an IRB and followed the requisite regulatory procedures.
In conclusion, translating research-based interventions into practice requires a critical evaluation of the published research studies to ensure that the ethical values and principles of the CFR are upheld. When selecting a practice problem and corresponding research-based intervention, it is essential to assess the ethical implications and consider factors such as informed consent, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and respect for autonomy. Additionally, adherence to the specific regulations outlined in the CFR, such as obtaining IRB approval, is crucial. By addressing these ethical considerations, researchers and healthcare professionals can ensure the ethical treatment of research subjects and facilitate the successful integration of research findings into clinical practice.