Week 7 Assignment Click to open discussion question. Based on your readings, compare and contrast (view any similarities or differences between) the theories of Dr. Martha Rogers and Dr. Rosemarie Rizzo Parse’s theories. Which nursing theorist would you prefer and why? Purchase the answer to view it Purchase the answer to view it
Dr. Martha Rogers and Dr. Rosemarie Rizzo Parse are two prominent figures in the field of nursing theory. Their respective theories, the Science of Unitary Human Beings by Rogers and the Theory of Human Becoming by Parse, have made significant contributions to our understanding of nursing practice. Despite their similarities in approaching nursing from a holistic perspective, there are distinct differences between the two theories. This essay will compare and contrast these theories, highlighting their key features, and offer an assessment of which theorist is preferable.
Both Rogers and Parse share a common view of the individual as a complex, unique being, and emphasize the importance of holistic care. Rogers’ Science of Unitary Human Beings posits that humans are interconnected with their environment and cannot be separated from it. This theory suggests that humans are energy fields within a larger cosmic energy field and are constantly exchanging energy with their surroundings. In contrast, Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming focuses on the lived experiences of individuals and encourages nurses to support individuals in their journey of becoming. Parse argues that humans are constantly changing, evolving beings, and nursing care should focus on facilitating their process of becoming who they are meant to be.
Another similarity between the two theories is their rejection of the biomedical model of care and their emphasis on the subjective experience of the individual. Rogers criticizes the reductionist approach of the biomedical model and instead advocates for a more holistic view of health. She argues that health is not merely the absence of disease but rather a state of harmony and balance between a person and their environment. Similarly, Parse challenges the reductionist view of health and emphasizes the importance of understanding the unique perspective of the individual. Both theorists recognize that individuals have their subjective experience of health and illness, and nursing care should be tailored to meet their individual needs and aspirations.
Despite these similarities, there are notable differences between the two theories. One key difference lies in their conceptualization of time. Rogers suggests that time is an illusion and that individuals exist in the eternal now. She argues that individuals are not bound by chronological time and that past, present, and future are all interconnected. In contrast, Parse views time as a dynamic and personal experience. She argues that individuals are temporal beings and that nursing care should take into account the individual’s lived experiences in the past, present, and future. Parse’s emphasis on time highlights the importance of recognizing individuals’ lived experiences and the impact of their past on their present and future.
Another difference between the theories is their conceptualization of the nurse’s role. Rogers suggests that the nurse’s primary role is that of a change agent, facilitating the individual’s process of change and transformation. She argues that nurses should use their knowledge and expertise to create an environment that supports the individual’s potential for growth. In contrast, Parse portrays the nurse’s role as that of a human becoming specialist, focusing on being present, authentically connecting with the individual, and supporting their process of becoming. Parse argues that nurses should strive to be fully present with the individual and provide a caring presence that enables them to freely express their own unique identity.
In assessing which nursing theorist is preferable, it is essential to consider the strengths and limitations of each theory. Roger’s Science of Unitary Human Beings offers a comprehensive and holistic perspective on nursing care, emphasizing the interconnectedness of individuals and their environment. This theory offers valuable insights into the promotion of harmony and balance in a person’s life. On the other hand, Parse’s Theory of Human Becoming highlights the importance of individual experiences and supports individuals in their journey of becoming. This theory recognizes the dynamic nature of human existence and emphasizes the humanistic aspects of nursing care.
Ultimately, the preference for one theorist over the other depends on the individual’s perspective and the context of nursing practice. Both theories have their strengths and limitations, and both offer valuable insights into nursing care. Therefore, it is crucial for nurses to critically analyze and incorporate elements from both theories into their practice, tailoring their approach to meet the needs of each unique individual they encounter. By doing so, nurses can provide holistic and individualized care that promotes the health and well-being of their patients.