assignment 1 leading

/0 Comments/in /by

Assignment 1: Affordable Care Act Analysis Paper (29 points)
The student will write a scholarly paper that analyzes the ethical, political, economic, and cultural impact of the 2010 Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) on patient and population outcomes.
Assignment Criteria:
Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria:
1. Provide a brief overview of the ACA
2. Compare and contrast how the ACA has changed from 2010 to the current healthcare environment of 2022.
3. Describe the impact ACA has on patient and population outcomes from the following perspectives:
Nova Southeastern University
Ron and Kathy Assaf College of Nursing 14
NSG 7350: Leading in Complex Healthcare Systems
Activities and Assignments (202420)
9.14.21 HEM;1.14.22LLS/TG; 9.13.22 JM; 12.5.22 TG/JM; 2.6.23TG/JM; 7.26.23 KJB
ï‚· Ethical
ï‚· Political
ï‚· Economic (including cost-effectiveness and sustainability)
ï‚· Cultural
4. Discuss how the doctoral of nursing practice (DNP) is prepared to impact patient and population outcomes positively:
ï‚· Commitment to system solutions
ï‚· Evidence-based leadership skills
ï‚· Sound financial decisions
5. The scholarly paper should be in narrative format, 5 to 6 pages, excluding the title and reference page.
6. Include an introductory paragraph, a purpose statement, and a conclusion.
7. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the paper.
8. Write the paper in the third person, not the first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify:
I, we, you, me, our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
9. Include a minimum of five (5) professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich
Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.
10. APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).
11. Submit the assignment to Turnitin prior to the final submission, review the originality report, and make any needed changes.
12. Submit by the posted due date.
Assignment 1: Affordable Care Act Analysis Paper Grading Rubric (29 points)
Assignment Criteria 12 points 10 points 4 points 2 points
All topics/criteria
addressed, and all
questions fully answered.
All topics/criteria
addressed, and most
questions fully answered.
All topics/criteria
addressed, and most
questions partially
answered.
One or more topics/criteria
not addressed or completely
answered.
Quality/Accuracy of
Information
12 points 10 points 4 points 0 point
Nova Southeastern University
Ron and Kathy Assaf College of Nursing 15
NSG 7350: Leading in Complex Healthcare Systems
Activities and Assignments (202420)
9.14.21 HEM;1.14.22LLS/TG; 9.13.22 JM; 12.5.22 TG/JM; 2.6.23TG/JM; 7.26.23 KJB
Assignment 2: Cost-Benefit Analysis/Paper (25 points)
A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) compares anticipated financial benefits against the proposed project’s costs to implement and sustain
the project’s changes. Differences between the two identifies financial return on investment (ROI). The student will conduct a
cost/benefit analysis on the proposed Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) project and write a scholarly paper that explains the CBA and
anticipated ROI.
Information clearly
relates to the main
topic/criteria. It includes
several supporting details
and/or examples.
Information clearly
relates to the main
topic/criteria. It provides
supporting details and/or
examples.
Information clearly relates
to the main topic/criteria.
A few details and/or
examples are given.
Information has little or
nothing to do with the main
topic/criteria.
Organization 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 point
Information is very
organized with well-
constructed paragraphs
and levels of heading.
Information organized
with well-constructed
paragraphs and levels of
heading.
There is an attempt at
organization, but errors
exist. No levels of
heading.
The information or overall
structure appears
disorganized.
Sources 2 points 1 point 0.5 point 0 point
All references are from a
relevant professional
peer-reviewed scholarly
journal, within a 5-year
timeframe, or a classic/
historical source.
The majority of
references are from a
relevant professional
peer-reviewed scholarly
journal, within a 5-year
timeframe or a
classic/historical source.
Some references are from
non-peer-reviewed
scholarly sources or older
than 5-years.
Majority of references are
from non-peer-reviewed
scholarly sources or older
than 5-years.
Earned Points
Up to 10% of the assigned points (total points of assignment) can be deducted from the earned points for errors in APA style [title
page, introduction, purpose statement, level heading, conclusion, references, citations, and format], spelling, and/or grammar.
Final Total

assignment 1 health

/0 Comments/in /by

Assignment 1: Evaluation of Information Systems (27 points)
Review the stages of the systems development life cycle (SDLC) in course readings and presentations. Utilize readings from the textbook, modules, and a search for information sources to formulate your responses.

This assignment is one formal paper that contains two parts.

Part 1
These questions require answers made after an electronic health record (EHR) or new EHR application/feature has already been selected and implemented by an organization. For example, an organization may have just implemented a new EHR, or the organization has replaced an existing EHR, or the organization has added new functionality such as clinical decision support system features or a patient portal. Consider which additional or new HIT application/feature is of interest for your DNP practice and will result in improved care.
Part 2
Students will analyze one unintended consequence (e-iatrogenesis) of the proposed EHR or EHR application/feature from Part 1. The unintended consequence may be one that is either “good” or “bad.” Students will create a visual fishbone diagram that shows the cause(s) and effect(s) of the problem with the EHR/EHR application/feature. Review the readings and the content found in the modules re: fishbone diagrams and e-iatrogenesis.

Assignment Criteria:
Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following:
Complete Part 1: System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Implementation and Evaluation Stages: Proposed EHR/EHR Application/Feature
1. Briefly define the implementation and evaluation stages of the SDLC and describe the specific and expected role activities of the DNP as an interprofessional team member during these two stages. Cite one or more sources.
2. Describe the new EHR or one new EHR feature, function, or application of interest that may benefit or supplement the current EHR for a healthcare organization.
a. Students should search the Internet for specific names and information about existing commercial products for the selected system application or EHR application/feature or function.
b. Students are not designing the application/feature or function for an EHR but selecting an existing, new, or additional product.
3. Briefly describe the name, purpose, and vendor for the proposed new EHR application/feature or function proposed be added to an existing EHR or an electronic clinical information system.
4. Identify the type of healthcare organization (e.g., hospital, clinic, or public health agency, health care software company, government health information website, private virtual health information site, etc.) that will utilize the proposed system. Explain how the EHR/EHR application/feature is utilized for clinical, administrative, educational, or research purposes.
5. Explain how this proposed EHR or EHR application/feature meets two of the Healthy People 2030 objectives for the topic, Health IT (See Modules/Week 2). Cite one or more sources to support response.
6. Define” system interoperability” and “medical device integration” and explain how the proposed EHR or EHR application/ feature meets these HITECH standards. Cite sources.
7. Search the NQF database or other sources and identify and explain one quality metric that can be used to evaluate end-user or stakeholder satisfaction with the system post implementation.
8. Discuss the evidence needed to determine whether further training for system users is needed post-implementation. Cite sources.
9. Identify the name, characteristics, and type of one additional metric you will propose to assess the effectiveness, quality, or safety of the proposed EHR or EHR application/feature. Cite sources.

Complete Part 2: Assessing E-iatrogenesis or the Unintended Consequences of the EHR/EHR application/feature.
10. Analyze the system in Part 1 for one possible unintended consequence that has or may occur post implementing the proposed system/feature. Cite sources.
11. Describe the unintended consequence and cite sources.
12. Generate a fishbone diagram to show the specific causes and effects of the problem (see Modules/Week 2).
a. Create this as Figure 1 and insert into an appendix.
i. See the APA 7th edition manual for format.
13. Provide one or more priority solutions that could be implemented (proposed Remediation Plan) by the interprofessional team to alleviate the causes and effects of the problem. Cite sources.
14. The scholarly paper should be in narrative format, 5 to 6 pages excluding the appendix, title page, and reference page.
15. Include an introductory paragraph with the purpose of the paper and a conclusion to the paper.
16. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the content of the paper.
17. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, or our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
18. Include a minimum of five professional, peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory). References should be less than five (5) years old unless the reference is a classic or historical article.
19. APA7th edition format required (attention to spelling/grammar, format for a title page and a reference page, use of paraphrasing/quotes, and format for in-text citations).

assignments 1 translanting

/0 Comments/in /by

use what is the effect of abc please DBT skills on females age 18 to 99 with major depression

Assignment 1: Teaching Intervention and National Clinical Guidelines Paper (30 Points)
For this assignment, the DNP student will highlight the select DNP interventions and/or Clinical Practice Guidelines or EBP for the DNP project and develop a teaching intervention to achieve the desired outcomes.
Assignment Criteria:
1. State the DNP project, PIO/PICO/PICOT question and population.
2. Identify the intervention chosen to achieve your outcomes/goals
3. Develop a teaching intervention
4. Incorporate National Clinical Guidelines (if available) or use the best EBP available
5. Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, and a conclusion. There is no page range or limit for this paper.
6. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the paper.
7. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner. To clarify: I, we, you, me, our is not used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
8. Include a minimum of four professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.
9. APA format is required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).
10. Submit the assignment to Turnitin prior to the final submission, review the originality report, and make any needed changes.
11. Submit by the posted due date.

Assignment 1: Teaching Intervention and National Clinical Guidelines Paper (30 points)

Assignment Criteria 10 points 7 points 4 points 1 point
All topics/criteria addressed, and all questions fully answered. All topics/criteria addressed, and most questions fully answered. All topics/criteria addressed, and most questions partially answered.

One or more topics/criteria not addressed or completely answered.
Quality/Accuracy of Information 10 points 7 points 4 points 0 point
Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It provides supporting details and/or examples. Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. A few details and/or examples are given. Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic/criteria.
Organization 7 points 4 points 2 points 0 point
Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading. Information organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading. There is an attempt at organization, but errors exist. No levels of heading. The information or overall structure appears disorganized.
Sources 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 point
All references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe, or a classic/ historical source. The majority of references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe or a classic/historical source. Some references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years. Majority of references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years.
Earned Points
Up to 10% of the assigned points (total points of assignment) can be deducted from the earned points for errors in APA style [title page, introduction, purpose statement, level heading, conclusion, references, citations, and format], spelling, and/or grammar.
Final Total

Week 2 translating

/0 Comments/in /by

Identify one thing you learned that will help you complete your DNP Project and why.
Explain why you think it is important to complete CITI training for the DNP project.

Week 2 leading

/0 Comments/in /by

Leadership roles, responsibilities, and skills are needed for developing and maintaining environments conducive to patient satisfaction, employee satisfaction, motivation, and balancing the economics of nursing practice.

Discuss two (2) challenges/risks a leader may encounter related to developing and maintaining an environment conducive for patient satisfaction.
Describe one (1) collaborative approach a leader could implement to achieve identity alignment between the functional and organizational level of an organization.

Week 2 health

/0 Comments/in /by

Access one HIMSS Davies Awards recipient for a health information technology (HIT) innovation (website located in Modules/Week 2)

Choose and review one enterprise, community health, or ambulatory care recipient’s electronic health records (EHR)/HIT report.
Create an APA 7th edition formatted table that lists the award recipient, HIT solution goal, utilization of the HIT solution, one or more patient outcomes measured (metrics), and one key lesson they learned (about workflow design, implementation challenges, best practice adherence, or patient engagement) from the recipient’s HIT implementation.
Provide the webpage URL and references to support information in the table.
Explain how the student’s organization’s use of HIT compares to this Davies award recipient’s implementation.

Translating week 1

/0 Comments/in /by

the identified EBP/Clinical Practice Guidelines

week 1 health responses

/0 Comments/in /by

everyone is writing about the same topic so write another paper and i will use it to respond to the other students

Question 1: The role of a future DNP professional is guided in part by components of interprofessional teamwork and the Institute of Medicine’s Core Competencies Needed for Health Professionals (see Modules/Week 1).
Explain with a specific example how the DNP can engage in interprofessional collaboration when using health informatics tools and data management skills in clinical practice.
Question 2: Complete the Informatics Self-Assessment Tool for Nurses (see Modules/Week 1).
Identify your overall score and your greatest informatics strength and weakness from the Informatics Self-Assessment Tool related to health information technology (HIT).
Question 3: Describe how your greatest informatics strength compares to one specific competency listed in the American Association of Colleges of Nursing’s (AACN) The Essentials, Domain 8 Informatics and Healthcare Technologies (see Modules/Week 1).

leading week 1 response to Kyle

/0 Comments/in /by

My current courses include Health Information Systems, Leading in Systems, and Translating Evidence, and am majoring as a AGACNP / DNP, with this being my 7th out of 9 semesters!

Once I finish school, I plan to work either in the ICU or ER/Trauma as an APRN.

Discussion board

The Competing Values Framework (CVF) is a popular model used for identifying which style of organizational leadership is most effective. This model heavily emphasizes when transactional leadership or transformational leadership is appropriate, and applies it against four dimensions – collaborate (clan), control (hierarchy), create, (adhocracy) and compete (market). Collaboration calls to do things as a group, and to do things together. Control calls for following the leader in order to do things right. Create advocates for doing things first, then assessing after. Lastly, compete aims to please the market, do things fast and focus on efficiency / costs effectiveness (Weber et al., 2022). A transactional leader is marked by processes involving acknowledgment, remuneration, or penalties, corrective measures initiated by the transactional leader are based on employee performance in executing assigned tasks. Team members typically operate autonomously, and there is a lack of collaboration among employees who display a short-term commitment to the organization. Transactional leadership falls short in cultivating trust between the leader and followers; it does not necessitate the leader to tread an ethical or moral path and relies on externally motivating the employee to engage in their duties for personal gain. The primary objective of this form of leadership is to reach a consensus on a series of actions that fulfill the distinct and immediate objectives of both the leader and the followers. Transactional leadership is characterized by attributes such as rigidity, self-centeredness, and exerting control over subordinates. This type of leader follows toward the control and compete dimensions (Alharbi, 2018; Specchia et al., 2021). On the contrary, a transformational leader has a significantly more positive impact. Distinguished by charismatic impact, skillful communication, appreciation of relationships, and personalized attention, this leadership style embodies the ability to instill loyalty by fostering shared objectives. This synergy leads to heightened productivity, enhanced morale, and greater job satisfaction among employees. Transformational leaders harness idealized influence, inspiration, motivation, intellectual stimulation, and personalized attention to attain exceptional outcomes. They motivate individuals to surpass their initial intentions, frequently achieving more than they believed feasible. These leaders aspire to motivate their followers to transcend self-interest and surpass expectations, thereby advancing the interests of the team and the organization. This style follows the collaborate and create dimensions of the CVF (Alharbi, 2018; Specchia et al., 2021).

References

Alharbi, S. H. (2018). Organizational culture assessment using the competing values framework (CVF) in public universities in Saudi Arabia: A case study of Tabuk University. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.20472/BM.2018.6.2.001

Specchia, M. L., Cozzolino, M. R., Carini, E., Di Pilla, A., Galletti, C., Ricciardi, W., & Damiani, G. (2021). Leadership styles and nurses’ job satisfaction. Results of a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041552

Weber, E., Krehl, E. H., & Buttgen, M. (2022). The digital transformation leadership framework: Conceptual and empirical insights into leadership roles in technology-driven business environments. Journal of Leadership Studies, 16(1), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21810

No Plagiarism minimum of 450 wordsInternet-related crime occ…

/in /by

No Plagiarism minimum of 450 words Internet-related crime occurs every minute. Cybercriminals steal millions of dollars with near impunity. For everyone that is captured nearly 10,000 or not captured. For every one successful prosecuted in a court of law, 100 get off without punishment or with a warning. Why is it so difficult to prosecute cybercriminals? Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least TWO of the following: At least one scholarly source should be used in the initial discussion thread. Be sure to use information from your readings. Use proper citations and references in your post.

Title: Challenges in Prosecuting Cybercriminals: A Complex Legal Landscape

Introduction:
The digital age has ushered in a new era of crime, with cybercriminals exploiting the vulnerabilities of the internet to commit various offenses. However, prosecuting these individuals presents a daunting challenge for law enforcement agencies across the globe. This discussion aims to shed light on the reasons behind the difficulty in prosecuting cybercriminals.

I. Evolving Jurisdictional Issues:
One major obstacle in prosecuting cybercriminals is the jurisdictional complexity that arises due to the borderless nature of the internet. Cybercrimes can be perpetrated from one country, while the victims and evidence reside in other countries. This raises questions regarding the application of legal frameworks, enforcement capabilities, and mutual legal assistance between nations. The lack of international cooperation and harmonization of cybercrime laws hinders effective prosecution.

An illustrative example of jurisdictional challenges is seen in cases where cybercriminals operate from countries with inadequate cybercrime legislation or with lenient extradition policies. This creates safe havens where criminals can carry out their activities relatively unimpeded. As a result, the inability to extradite suspects or retrieve evidence from such regions significantly hampers prosecution efforts.

II. Technical Complexity:
Cybercrimes often involve sophisticated techniques that are challenging to investigate and prosecute. This can include the use of encryption protocols, anonymizing services, and hacking methods, which enable cybercriminals to conceal their identities and locations. Furthermore, the global nature of cybercriminal networks makes it difficult to trace and attribute crimes to specific individuals or groups.

A lack of specialized technical expertise within law enforcement agencies further exacerbates the challenge. As law enforcement struggles to keep pace with rapidly evolving technologies, there is a growing need for investigators and prosecutors with advanced knowledge of digital forensics, network analysis, and cybersecurity. Without adequate training and resources, the identification, retrieval, and preservation of digital evidence becomes a formidable task.

III. Impediments of Transnational Cooperation:
Efficient transnational cooperation is vital in combating cybercrime. However, varying domestic legal systems, cultural differences, and geopolitical factors often impede effective collaboration between countries. Mutual legal assistance requests may encounter delays or rejections due to differences in legal standards, privacy concerns, or political considerations.

For instance, conflicts arising from differing approaches to the balance between cybersecurity and privacy can hinder information sharing and impede prosecution efforts. Additionally, the lack of a standardized framework for data sharing and cross-border cooperation poses significant hurdles in cybercrime investigations.

IV. Advancements in Cryptocurrency:
The rising prevalence of cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, has allowed cybercriminals to exploit the anonymity they provide for financial transactions. This decentralized and often unregulated digital currency complicates prosecution efforts, as traditional methods of seizing assets become more challenging to enforce. The use of cryptocurrencies facilitates money laundering and financial anonymity, creating yet another obstacle for investigators and prosecutors.

Overall, the difficulty in prosecuting cybercriminals arises due to the complex nature of jurisdictional issues, technical challenges, limited transnational cooperation, and the impact of advancements in cryptocurrency. Addressing these obstacles requires international collaboration, the development of specialized expertise within law enforcement agencies, and the establishment of clear legal frameworks that can adapt to the rapidly evolving digital landscape.