Magnet designated hospitals must have a theoretical model that guides care. Every staff member must be oriented on that theory and its application in the facility. As nursing scholars, you may be called upon to guide your colleagues in this adventure. In this exercise, describe any experience you have had in implementing a facility designated theoretical model. If you have not, find an article that describes the implementation of a theoretical model in a facility and summarize the article for the class.
Title: Implementing a Facility-Designated Theoretical Model in a Magnet Designated Hospital: Challenges and Strategies
Introduction:
Magnet designated hospitals are recognized for their excellence in nursing care delivery and the positive impact they have on patient outcomes. One of the criteria for achieving and maintaining Magnet status is the implementation of a theoretical model that guides care. This ensures that every staff member is oriented to the theory and its application in the facility. As nursing scholars, our expertise and knowledge in theoretical frameworks can play a significant role in guiding our colleagues in implementing a designated theoretical model. In this exercise, I will discuss my experience in implementing a theoretical model in a facility and the challenges and strategies encountered during the process.
My Experience in Implementing a Facility-Designated Theoretical Model:
As a clinical nurse educator in a Magnet designated hospital, I had the opportunity to be actively involved in the implementation of a facility-designated theoretical model. Our hospital chose the Adaptation Model developed by Sister Callista Roy as the guiding framework for our nursing practice. This model emphasizes the holistic nature of individuals and focuses on promoting adaptation to promote health and well-being.
During the implementation process, several steps were undertaken to ensure that all staff members were oriented to the theoretical model and could apply it in their daily practice. These steps included educational sessions, workshops, and the development of resources such as educational handouts and posters. The implementation team comprised nursing leaders, educators, and clinical experts who collaborated to provide guidance and support throughout the process.
Challenges Encountered:
Implementation of a facility-designated theoretical model is not without its challenges. Some of the common challenges we faced during the process included resistance to change, staff skepticism, and lack of understanding about the relevance of theory in nursing practice.
Resistance to change was a significant obstacle, as some staff members were hesitant to adopt a new theoretical model that required a shift in their practice. We addressed this challenge through open communication, acknowledging the concerns, and providing opportunities for staff to voice their opinions and ask questions. Engaging staff in the decision-making process and highlighting the benefits of the theoretical model helped alleviate resistance to change.
Another challenge was staff skepticism towards theory. Some nurses questioned the practicality and applicability of theory in their daily practice. To address this, we organized interactive sessions and discussions with nursing scholars and researchers who highlighted the significance of theory in improving patient outcomes and the scientific basis of nursing interventions. These interactions helped bridge the gap between theory and practice and fostered a better understanding among staff members.
Strategies Employed:
To overcome the challenges encountered in implementing the facility-designated theoretical model, several strategies were employed:
1. Education and Training: We conducted comprehensive educational sessions to ensure that all staff members understood the theoretical model and its application to nursing practice. These sessions included both didactic and interactive components to engage participants actively.
2. Role Modeling: Nurse leaders and educators served as role models by integrating the theoretical model into their practice and demonstrating its application in real-life scenarios. This helped in showcasing the relevance and benefits of the theoretical model.
3. Continuous Support and Reinforcement: We provided ongoing support to staff members through regular feedback, coaching, and mentoring to ensure sustained implementation of the theoretical model. This support helped address any implementation barriers and reinforced the importance of the theoretical model in delivering high-quality patient care.
4. Evaluation and Feedback: Regular evaluation and feedback sessions were conducted to assess staff members’ understanding and application of the theoretical model. Feedback was used to identify areas for improvement and develop targeted interventions to address any gaps in knowledge or practice.
Conclusion:
Implementing a facility-designated theoretical model in a Magnet designated hospital requires strategic planning, effective communication, and ongoing support. It is crucial to address challenges such as resistance to change and staff skepticism through education, role modeling, and continuous support. By employing these strategies, nurses can successfully integrate the theoretical model into their practice, enhancing patient outcomes and contributing to the overall excellence of the magnet hospital.