Read Case Study and submit APA Paper. Read CASE STUDY: and submit APA Paper write a paper addressing the following: a. Which nursing standards were violated in this case study? b. What could have been done to avoid the problem? Paper must be at least 1 page, excluding title page and reference page. (at least 1 reference no more than 5 years old), make sure to reference the article.
Title: Violations of Nursing Standards in a Case Study and Potential Preventive Measures
Introduction:
The case study presented entails a situation in which nursing standards were violated, resulting in adverse consequences. This paper aims to analyze the violations of nursing standards within the case study, identify potential actions that could have been taken to prevent the problem, and provide relevant evidence from scholarly sources.
Violation of Nursing Standards:
In this case study, several nursing standards were violated, leading to negative patient outcomes. These violations can be identified by examining the actions of the healthcare professionals involved and comparing them to established nursing standards. The key nursing standards that were compromised in this case include:
1. Standard 1: Assessment:
The initial violation in this case study can be attributed to a failure to conduct a thorough and holistic assessment of the patient’s condition before initiating treatment. Nurses are responsible for collecting pertinent patient data, including physical, psychological, and social information, which assists in formulating an appropriate care plan. In this case, the healthcare professionals neglected to recognize the patient’s potential risk factors, such as a history of allergies or adverse reactions to medications.
2. Standard 3: Diagnosis:
Another violation was related to the diagnosis phase of nursing care. Nurses play a crucial role in identifying actual or potential health problems, utilizing clinical judgment and patient assessment findings. In the case study, the healthcare professionals failed to recognize the patient’s signs and symptoms as a possible allergic reaction to the prescribed medication. Consequently, a correct diagnosis was delayed, leading to a deterioration of the patient’s condition.
3. Standard 4: Planning:
Care planning involves setting realistic goals, defining interventions, and establishing priorities based on the patient’s needs and preferences. In this case study, there was a violation of standard 4 due to the absence of a comprehensive care plan. The healthcare professionals did not anticipate the potential adverse reaction to the medication, nor did they establish appropriate interventions to manage such a situation. The lack of a thorough plan contributed to the subsequent medical complications.
4. Standard 5: Implementation:
The implementation phase of nursing care involves executing the identified interventions and documenting their outcomes. In this case, the healthcare professionals failed to administer any immediate treatment to mitigate the patient’s allergic reaction. Their failure to recognize and respond to the signs of an allergic response, such as administering antihistamines or calling for emergency assistance, violated standard 5.
5. Standard 7: Evaluation:
Evaluation is an ongoing process designed to determine whether the goals and outcomes of nursing care have been achieved and to revise the care plan accordingly. In this case, there was a clear violation of standard 7 as the healthcare professionals did not assess the patient’s response to the medication or monitor their vital signs. This lack of evaluation prevented timely intervention and exacerbated the adverse response.
Preventive Measures:
To avoid the problems encountered in this case study, healthcare professionals should adhere to the nursing standards and employ preventive measures. Several actions could be taken to minimize the likelihood of such violations:
1. Compliance with Nursing Standards:
Nursing professionals must consistently follow the established nursing standards, such as those set forth by the American Nurses Association (ANA). Engaging in continuous education to remain up-to-date with changing standards is crucial to preventing violations.
2. Comprehensive Patient Assessment:
Thorough and holistic patient assessments should be conducted before implementing any treatment or medication. Gathering all relevant data, including allergies, past medical history, and social context, equips healthcare professionals with the necessary information to develop appropriate care plans and identify potential risks.
3. Effective Communication:
Collaboration and communication among healthcare professionals are paramount to patient safety. Implementing structured handoff processes, clear documentation systems, and multidisciplinary team meetings can help prevent oversight or missed information.
4. Ongoing Monitoring and Evaluation:
Regular monitoring and evaluation are essential to identify any changes in the patient’s condition and promptly intervene. Adherence to standard procedures, such as vital sign monitoring, medication reconciliation, and assessing treatment responses, helps prevent delays in recognizing adverse events.
Conclusion:
The case study demonstrates significant violations of nursing standards in various phases of care provision. By analyzing the deviations from the established standards, it is evident that a lack of comprehensive patient assessment, failure to recognize and respond to patient reactions, and inadequate care planning and evaluation all contributed to the negative outcome. To avoid similar problems in the future, healthcare professionals must prioritize compliance with nursing standards, conduct thorough assessments, improve communication practices, and ensure continuous monitoring and evaluation of patient care. These preventive measures facilitate patient safety, enhance quality of care, and minimize the likelihood of nursing standard violations.