You have been asked to be a peer reviewer for a team of nurse researchers who are conducting a phenomenological study of the experiences of physical abuse during pregnancy. What specific questions would you ask the team during debriefing and what documents would you want the researchers to share? I need at least 2 references including this book:

Title: Peer Review Questions and Required Documents for a Phenomenological Study on Experiences of Physical Abuse During Pregnancy

Introduction:
As a peer reviewer for a team of nurse researchers conducting a phenomenological study on the experiences of physical abuse during pregnancy, it is vital to ensure the research is rigorous, ethical, and contributes meaningfully to the existing knowledge base. In this review, we will outline specific questions to ask the research team during debriefing and identify the essential documents that should be shared with the reviewers.

Peer Review Questions:
1. Research Design and Methodology:
a. How did you determine that a phenomenological approach is appropriate for this study? Have you considered alternative methodologies and their potential advantages or limitations in capturing the experiences of physical abuse during pregnancy?
b. Can you describe the specific steps you followed to ensure credibility, transferability, and dependability in conducting the study? How did you address potential bias and protect the rights and well-being of participants?
c. How did you establish trustworthiness in data collection and analysis? What strategies have you employed to enhance the rigor and quality of your findings?

2. Sampling and Recruitment:
a. How did you determine the sample size for this study? What considerations were given to ensure a sufficient and diverse participant pool to capture a range of experiences?
b. What criteria did you use to select participants? Have you considered potential biases in your sampling strategy, such as excluding certain demographics or geographic locations?
c. Can you elaborate on your recruitment process? How did you ensure informed consent, privacy, and confidentiality for participants? How did you overcome potential barriers to recruitment, such as reluctance to disclose abuse?

3. Data Collection and Analysis:
a. What approaches did you use to collect data, such as interviews or diaries? How did you ensure that participant responses were captured accurately and comprehensively?
b. Can you explain the process of data analysis in detail? How did you identify recurring themes or patterns in the data, and how were these themes validated? How did you address potential researcher bias during analysis?
c. Did you encounter any challenges or limitations during data collection or analysis? How did you address or mitigate these challenges to ensure the trustworthiness and validity of your findings?

4. Ethical Considerations:
a. What steps have been taken to ensure ethical conduct throughout the study? Have you obtained proper ethical approval from an institutional review board (IRB) or a similar authority?
b. How did you address any potential harm or distress to participants during data collection or study participation? Were appropriate support services provided or made available?
c. Can you explain how you have maintained participant confidentiality and privacy? How have you addressed any potential risks associated with data storage, management, and retention?

Required Documents:
1. Research Proposal:
The research proposal should be shared with reviewers to gain insights into the research aims, objectives, research questions, and the proposed methodology. This document will provide background information to contextualize the study and allow reviewers to assess the feasibility and alignment of the research design with the research questions.

2. Informed Consent Form:
Reviewers should have access to the informed consent form used to obtain participant consent. This document will help reviewers assess the adequacy of the informed consent process, including the provision of relevant study details, potential risks, benefits, and assurance of participant confidentiality.

3. Interview Protocols or Data Collection Instruments:
The interview protocols or data collection instruments should be shared with reviewers to ascertain the appropriateness and relevance of the questions asked. Reviewers can assess whether the protocols capture the desired phenomena and align with the research objectives.

4. Data Analysis Plan:
The data analysis plan should be shared to enable reviewers to evaluate the rigor of the analytical process. This document will help reviewers understand how themes or patterns were identified, whether multiple coders were involved for validation, and what steps were taken to mitigate researcher bias.

Conclusion:
When conducting a peer review for a phenomenological study on the experiences of physical abuse during pregnancy, it is crucial to ask specific questions that address various aspects of the research design, methodology, ethical considerations, and data analysis. Additionally, sharing essential documents like the research proposal, informed consent form, interview protocols, and data analysis plan will enable reviewers to assess the validity, rigor, and ethical conduct of the study. By engaging in a comprehensive peer review, nurse researchers can ensure the credibility and meaningful contribution of their findings to the field.